Calix v. United States of America
Case Summary
The court denied defendant Calix's motion to suppress evidence obtained from a search warrant. The warrant was issued based on probable cause, and the court found that the search was lawful. This decision allows the prosecution to use the evidence against Calix in the upcoming trial.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Docket Snapshot
Court
S.D.N.Y.
Southern District of New York · 2nd Circuit · NY
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:13-cr-00582-1 USA v. Calix
Other · May 06, 2026
Coverage
2 articles
1 source tracked
Participants
1 Defendant
4 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Southern District of New York, a federal district court in NY.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 06, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes United States of America and others.
Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 1 distinct source.
About This Court
Southern District of New York (S.D.N.Y.) is a federal district court in the 2nd Circuit, NY.
Case Timeline
2 events1:13-cr-00582-1 USA v. Calix
The court denied defendant Calix's motion to suppress evidence obtained from a search warrant. The warrant was issued based on probable cause, and the court found that the search was lawful. This decision allows the prosecution to use the evidence against Calix in the upcoming trial.
1:20-cv-09680 Calix v. United States of America
The court granted a motion to seal documents in the Calix v. United States of America case. This means that certain information will be kept private and not publicly available. The sealing of documents is often used to protect sensitive information.
Press Coverage
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 2 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
22 hours, 30 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.