civil-litigation settlement federal-courts court-watch

Caceres Sues Middlesex Probate and Family Court

25-cv-10901 N.D. Cal.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Caceres has filed a lawsuit against the Middlesex Probate and Family Court. The case, 25-cv-10901, involves a request to terminate a civil case. The details of the lawsuit are not provided, but it appears to be a routine matter.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • lawsuit
  • probate court
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

N.D. Cal.

Northern District of California · 9th Circuit · CA

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

5:25-cv-10901 Johnson v. Bank of America, N.A.

Other · Apr 23, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

2 articles

2 sources tracked

groups

Participants

2 Defendants

4 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Northern District of California, a federal district court in CA.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 23, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes Middlesex Probate and Family Court, Bank of America, N.A and others.

Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 2 distinct sources.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 2 days, 15 hours ago

Caceres Sues Middlesex Probate and Family Court is an active civil matter in Northern District of California under docket 25-cv-10901.

The main identified defendant or respondent is Bank of America, N.A and Middlesex Probate and Family Court. The case is currently organized around probate court.

Caceres has filed a lawsuit against the Middlesex Probate and Family Court. The case, 25-cv-10901, involves a request to terminate a civil case. The details of the lawsuit are not provided, but it appears to be a routine matter.

On April 23, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court terminated the civil case Johnson v. Bank of America, N.A. (5:25-cv-10901) on a motion to terminate.

This means the case is officially closed. The termination was likely due to a settlement or dismissal of the case. On April 23, 2026, the docket recorded a other: A copy of a court document was mailed to the Middlesex Probate and Family Court in a case filed by Caceres.

This action is part of the court proceedings, and the document's contents are not specified. The mailing of the document is a procedural step in the.

The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

About This Court

Northern District of California (N.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

2 events
info
Other April 23, 2026

5:25-cv-10901 Johnson v. Bank of America, N.A.

The court terminated the civil case Johnson v. Bank of America, N.A. (5:25-cv-10901) on a motion to terminate. This means the case is officially closed. The termination was likely due to a settlement or dismissal of the case.

info
Other April 23, 2026

1:25-cv-10901 Caceres v. Middlesex Probate and Family Court

A copy of a court document was mailed to the Middlesex Probate and Family Court in a case filed by Caceres. This action is part of the court proceedings, and the document's contents are not specified. The mailing of the document is a procedural step in the case.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

2 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

2 outlets · 2 articles

Timeline events

2 records on file

Last updated

2 days, 15 hours ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.