1:24-cv-00128 Burdette v. Acosta et al
Order on Motion to Consolidate Cases ( 75
Civil case in N.D. Ill. currently marked active. Latest development: 1:24-cv-00128 Burdette v. Acosta et al. Coverage tracked from 1 media source.
Latest development
Order · April 29, 2026
A Motion was filed.
description View filingCourt
N.D. Ill.
Northern District of Illinois · 7th Circuit · IL
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Court order issued
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:24-cv-00128 Burdette v. Acosta et al
Order · Apr 29, 2026
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
Participants
1 Plaintiff
2 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to Northern District of Illinois, a federal district court in IL.
The newest docket activity we have is a order dated April 29, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes 1:24-cv-00128 Burdette and others.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
Burdette v. Acosta et al is an active civil matter in Northern District of Illinois under docket 24-cv-00128.
The main identified plaintiff or petitioner is 1:24-cv-00128 Burdette. The case is currently organized around Federal jurisdiction and procedural posture, Current docket activity and next procedural step, Pending motions, orders, and near-term docket movement.
The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On April 29, 2026, the docket recorded a order: A Motion was filed.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest order produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
Northern District of Illinois (N.D. Ill.) is a federal district court in the 7th Circuit, IL.
A Motion was filed.
Order on Motion to Consolidate Cases ( 75
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
11 hours, 6 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.