legal-news

Brikman v. Westchester Medical Center Advanced Physician Services, P.C. et al

23-cv-10749 S.D.N.Y.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Brikman v. Westchester Medical Center Advanced Physician Services, P.C. et al is a civil case with a current summary of Internet Citation ( 113. The case is currently in an unknown court with docket number 23-cv-10749. The court has not provided further information about the case.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • Internet Citation ( 113
  • Unknown Court
  • 23-cv-10749
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

S.D.N.Y.

Southern District of New York · 2nd Circuit · NY

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

7:23-cv-10749 Brikman v. Westchester Medical Center Advanced Physician Services, P.C. et al

Other · Apr 29, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

1 article

1 source tracked

groups

Participants

1 Defendant

2 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Southern District of New York, a federal district court in NY.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 29, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes Westchester Medical Center Advanced Physician Services, P.C and others.

Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.

About This Court

Southern District of New York (S.D.N.Y.) is a federal district court in the 2nd Circuit, NY.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
info
Other April 29, 2026

7:23-cv-10749 Brikman v. Westchester Medical Center Advanced Physician Services, P.C. et al

The court granted a motion to seal a document in the Brikman v. Westchester Medical Center Advanced Physician Services, P.C. et al case. This means that the document will be kept private and not publicly available. The court's decision allows the parties to protect sensitive information.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

1 article
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 1 article

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

1 day, 4 hours ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.