2:25-cv-14578 BRIGGS v. PERFORMANCE FOOD SERVICE et al
Stipulation of Dismissal (aty) ( 14
BRIGGS v. PERFORMANCE FOOD SERVICE et al involves a stipulation of dismissal filed in an unknown court. The docket number is 25-cv-14578. The current summary indicates that the stipulation was filed on April 14.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Court
Court not identified
Awaiting court metadata
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
2:25-cv-14578 BRIGGS v. PERFORMANCE FOOD SERVICE et al
Other · Apr 28, 2026
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
Participants
1 Defendant
2 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 28, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes PERFORMANCE FOOD SERVICE and others.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
BRIGGS v. PERFORMANCE FOOD SERVICE et al is an active civil matter under docket 25-cv-14578.
The main identified defendant or respondent is PERFORMANCE FOOD SERVICE. The case is currently organized around stipulation of dismissal, dismissal filed, stipulation filed.
The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On April 28, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The parties filed a joint stipulation.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
The parties filed a joint stipulation.
Stipulation of Dismissal (aty) ( 14
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
11 hours, 34 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.