civil-litigation federal-courts court-watch

BODNER et al v. EGGERT et al

25-cv-14901 D.N.J.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

The court denied the Bodner plaintiffs' motion to compel the Eggert defendants to produce certain documents. This decision means the plaintiffs will not be able to access the requested information. The ruling is significant because it impacts the plaintiffs' ability to build their case.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • Federal jurisdiction and procedural posture
  • Current docket activity and next procedural step
  • Pending motions, orders, and near-term docket movement
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

D.N.J.

District of New Jersey · 3rd Circuit · NJ

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

3:25-cv-14901 BODNER et al v. EGGERT et al

Other · Apr 29, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

1 article

1 source tracked

groups

Participants

Parties not parsed yet

2 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to District of New Jersey, a federal district court in NJ.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 29, 2026.

Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.

Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 11 hours, 4 minutes ago

BODNER et al v. EGGERT et al is an active civil matter in District of New Jersey under docket 25-cv-14901.

The case is currently organized around Federal jurisdiction and procedural posture, Current docket activity and next procedural step, Pending motions, orders, and near-term docket movement.

The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.

On April 29, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court denied the Bodner plaintiffs' motion to compel the Eggert defendants to produce certain documents. This decision means the plaintiffs will not be able to access the requested information. The ruling is significant because it impacts the plaintiffs'.

The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

About This Court

District of New Jersey (D.N.J.) is a federal district court in the 3rd Circuit, NJ.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
info
Other April 29, 2026

3:25-cv-14901 BODNER et al v. EGGERT et al

The court denied the Bodner plaintiffs' motion to compel the Eggert defendants to produce certain documents. This decision means the plaintiffs will not be able to access the requested information. The ruling is significant because it impacts the plaintiffs' ability to build their case.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

1 article
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 1 article

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

11 hours, 4 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.