BODNER et al v. EGGERT et al
Case Summary
The court denied the Bodner plaintiffs' motion to compel the Eggert defendants to produce certain documents. This decision means the plaintiffs will not be able to access the requested information. The ruling is significant because it impacts the plaintiffs' ability to build their case.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Key Issues
- • Federal jurisdiction and procedural posture
- • Current docket activity and next procedural step
- • Pending motions, orders, and near-term docket movement
Docket Snapshot
Court
D.N.J.
District of New Jersey · 3rd Circuit · NJ
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
3:25-cv-14901 BODNER et al v. EGGERT et al
Other · Apr 29, 2026
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
Participants
Parties not parsed yet
2 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to District of New Jersey, a federal district court in NJ.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 29, 2026.
Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
The Story So Far
BODNER et al v. EGGERT et al is an active civil matter in District of New Jersey under docket 25-cv-14901.
The case is currently organized around Federal jurisdiction and procedural posture, Current docket activity and next procedural step, Pending motions, orders, and near-term docket movement.
The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On April 29, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court denied the Bodner plaintiffs' motion to compel the Eggert defendants to produce certain documents. This decision means the plaintiffs will not be able to access the requested information. The ruling is significant because it impacts the plaintiffs'.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
About This Court
District of New Jersey (D.N.J.) is a federal district court in the 3rd Circuit, NJ.
Case Timeline
1 event3:25-cv-14901 BODNER et al v. EGGERT et al
The court denied the Bodner plaintiffs' motion to compel the Eggert defendants to produce certain documents. This decision means the plaintiffs will not be able to access the requested information. The ruling is significant because it impacts the plaintiffs' ability to build their case.
Press Coverage
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
11 hours, 4 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.