1:25-cv-08831 Cuddy Law Firm, P.L.L.C. v. New York City Department of Education
Extension of Time to File Answer ( 16
The Cuddy Law Firm, P.L.L.C. has been granted an extension of time to file an answer in the case B.M. et al v. New York City Department of Education. This means they now have more time to respond to the original complaint. The extension was granted on the docket number 1:25-cv-08831.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Court
S.D.N.Y.
Southern District of New York · 2nd Circuit · NY
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:25-cv-08831 Cuddy Law Firm, P.L.L.C. v. New York City Department of Education
Other · May 05, 2026
Coverage
4 articles
1 source tracked
Participants
1 Defendant, 1 Government Agency, 2 Plaintiffs
6 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to Southern District of New York, a federal district court in NY.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 05, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes New York City Department of Education, 1:25-cv-08831 Cuddy Law Firm, P.L.L.C, 1:24-cv-09496 Cuddy Law Firm, P.L.L.C and others.
Press monitoring has found 4 related articles from 1 distinct source.
Southern District of New York (S.D.N.Y.) is a federal district court in the 2nd Circuit, NY.
The Cuddy Law Firm, P.L.L.C. has been granted an extension of time to file an answer in the case B.M. et al v. New York City Department of Education. This means they now have more time to respond to the original complaint. The extension was granted on the docket number 1:25-cv-08831.
The Cuddy Law Firm, P.L.L.C. filed a lawsuit against the New York City Department of Education in the case 1:24-cv-09496. The lawsuit is separate from the case B.M. et al v. New York City Department of Education. This filing is a new development in the ongoing litigation.
The parties filed a joint status report.
The court granted a motion to seal certain documents in the case B.M. et al v. New York City Department of Education. This decision allows the parties to keep sensitive information confidential. The ruling is significant because it sets a precedent for future cases involving sensitive student data.
Extension of Time to File Answer ( 16
Status Report ( 33
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 4 articles
Timeline events
4 records on file
Last updated
1 day ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.