Bleicher v. Aldinger
Case Summary
The court dismissed the case Bleicher v. Aldinger (1:26-cv-04861) due to the plaintiff's failure to state a valid claim. This means the plaintiff did not provide sufficient evidence to support their lawsuit. The dismissal is a significant setback for the plaintiff.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Docket Snapshot
Court
C.D. Cal.
Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
2:26-cv-04861 Lopez v. Park
Other · May 05, 2026
Coverage
2 articles
2 sources tracked
Participants
1 Plaintiff
4 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 05, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes 1:26-cv-04861 Bleicher and others.
Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 2 distinct sources.
About This Court
Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
Case Timeline
2 events2:26-cv-04861 Lopez v. Park
A Summons was issued.
1:26-cv-04861 Bleicher v. Aldinger
The court dismissed the case Bleicher v. Aldinger (1:26-cv-04861) due to the plaintiff's failure to state a valid claim. This means the plaintiff did not provide sufficient evidence to support their lawsuit. The dismissal is a significant setback for the plaintiff.
Press Coverage
1:26-cv-04861 Bleicher v. Aldinger
Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim ( 7
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
2 outlets · 2 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
18 hours, 32 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.