newspaper
civil-litigation
federal-courts
court-watch
hearing
Bey et al v. Westchester County Police Headquaters et al
24-cv-09098
N.D. Ill.
Advertisement
description
Case Summary
The case Bey et al v. Westchester County Police Headquarters et al is proceeding in the Northern District of Illinois under docket number 24-cv-09098. The current filing is a notice of hearing. A hearing has been scheduled by the court to review the case's status and discuss upcoming proceedings. The specific matters to be addressed at the hearing are not detailed.
Latest development
7:24-cv-09098 Bey et al v. Westchester County Police Headquaters et al
Hearing · April 22, 2026
A Notice of Hearing was filed.
description View filingKey Issues
- • Notice of hearing
- • Civil rights (potential)
- • Government litigation
smart_toy
Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records.
How we verify our work.
fact_check
Docket Snapshot
account_balance
Court
N.D. Ill.
Northern District of Illinois · 7th Circuit · IL
tag
Docket
Not captured
Civil
timeline
Stage
Active litigation
Active
event
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
new_releases
Latest Filing
1:26-cv-04627 KM LPTV of CHICAGO 13, LLC v. BAE et al
Other · Apr 23, 2026
newspaper
Coverage
2 articles
2 sources tracked
groups
Participants
1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff
4 linked entities
gavel
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Northern District of Illinois, a federal district court in IL.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 23, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Westchester County Police Headquaters, 1:26-cv-04627 KM LPTV of CHICAGO 13, LLC and others.
Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 2 distinct sources.
chronic
Updated 16 hours, 55 minutes ago
The Story So Far
Bey et al v. Westchester County Police Headquaters et al is an active civil matter in Northern District of Illinois under docket 24-cv-09098.
The dispute currently identifies 1:26-cv-04627 KM LPTV of CHICAGO 13, LLC on one side and Westchester County Police Headquaters on the other. The case is currently organized around notice of hearing, scheduled hearing.
The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On April 23, 2026, the docket recorded a other: A separate case, 1:26-cv-04627, was mistakenly referenced in the docket for Bey et al v. Westchester County Police Headquarters et al. This error has no bearing on the outcome of the main case.
The mistake is likely a clerical error that will be corrected. On April 22, 2026, the docket recorded a hearing: A Notice of Hearing was filed.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
smart_toy
Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline.
How we verify our work.
About This Court
Northern District of Illinois (N.D. Ill.) is a federal district court in the 7th Circuit, IL.
Advertisement
Case Timeline
2 events
info
Other
April 23, 2026
1:26-cv-04627 KM LPTV of CHICAGO 13, LLC v. BAE et al
A separate case, 1:26-cv-04627, was mistakenly referenced in the docket for Bey et al v. Westchester County Police Headquarters et al. This error has no bearing on the outcome of the main case. The mistake is likely a clerical error that will be corrected.
groups
Hearing
April 22, 2026
7:24-cv-09098 Bey et al v. Westchester County Police Headquaters et al
A Notice of Hearing was filed.
Advertisement
newspaper
2 articles
Press Coverage
newspaper
7:24-cv-09098 Bey et al v. Westchester County Police Headquaters et al
Notice of Hearing ( 44
Apr 22, 2026
1 min read
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
2 outlets · 2 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
10 hours, 45 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.