2:26-cv-04929 Mercado v. Costco Wholesale Corporation et al
Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties ( 4
The court has denied a motion in the case of Bennett v. Stonewall Kitchen, LLC, which is unrelated to the case of MCCAMPBELL v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al (3:26-cv-04929). This decision has no direct impact on the Bennett case. The court's ruling in MCCAMPBELL v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al remains unaffected.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Court
D.N.J.
District of New Jersey · 3rd Circuit · NJ
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
2:26-cv-04929 Mercado v. Costco Wholesale Corporation et al
Other · May 07, 2026
Coverage
3 articles
3 sources tracked
Participants
3 Defendants, 1 Plaintiff
6 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to District of New Jersey, a federal district court in NJ.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 07, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Stonewall Kitchen, LLC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON, Costco Wholesale Corporation and others.
Press monitoring has found 3 related articles from 3 distinct sources.
District of New Jersey (D.N.J.) is a federal district court in the 3rd Circuit, NJ.
A Notice of Interested Parties was filed.
The court has denied a motion in the case of Bennett v. Stonewall Kitchen, LLC, which is unrelated to the case of MCCAMPBELL v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al (3:26-cv-04929). This decision has no direct impact on the Bennett case. The court's ruling in MCCAMPBELL v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al remains unaffected.
The court granted a motion to seal certain documents in the Bennett v. Stonewall Kitchen, LLC case. This means that the sealed documents will not be publicly available. The court's decision allows the parties to protect sensitive information.
Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties ( 4
Sources tracked
3 outlets · 3 articles
Timeline events
3 records on file
Last updated
4 hours, 28 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.