legal-news

Bellinger v. Whole Foods Market, Inc. et al

26-cv-04356
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

This entry is a duplicate of case 16682 — same title, same docket number (26-cv-04356), and same parties: Bellinger against Whole Foods Market, Inc. et al. The available record contains no information distinguishing this entry from case 16682. This likely reflects a data ingestion or docket processing artifact. The substantive analysis from case 16682 applies.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • • Duplicate record — same docket as case 16682
  • • In forma pauperis eligibility
  • • Underlying claims against Whole Foods Market
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
info
Other April 20, 2026

1:26-cv-04356 Bellinger v. Whole Foods Market, Inc. et al

The court granted Bellinger leave to proceed in forma pauperis, meaning she can pursue her claims against Whole Foods without paying filing fees. This signals the court found her financial affidavit credible enough to clear the threshold — but it also means the case will now face mandatory screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915, where a judge reviews the complaint for frivolousness before Whole Foods ever sees a summons.

description View filing open_in_new
Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

1 article
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 1 article

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

2 hours, 11 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.