legal-news

Bell v. Maltby: Reconsideration Motion Filed

26-cv-11353 C.D. Cal.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

A reconsideration motion was filed in the Bell v. Maltby case. The details of the motion and the case are not specified in the provided information.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • reconsideration motion
  • Bell v. Maltby case
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

C.D. Cal.

Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

2:26-cr-00270-1 USA v. Bell

Other · May 04, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

2 articles

2 sources tracked

groups

Participants

Parties not parsed yet

4 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 04, 2026.

Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.

Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 2 distinct sources.

About This Court

Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

2 events
info
Other May 4, 2026

2:26-cr-00270-1 USA v. Bell

The court has received a motion for reconsideration in the case of USA v. Bell, a criminal matter. The motion is related to a jurisdiction transfer-in for probation or supervised release. This development may impact the case's progress and potential outcomes.

info
Other April 29, 2026

1:26-cv-11353 Bell v. Maltby et al

The court granted a motion for reconsideration in Bell v. Maltby et al, allowing the plaintiff to reargue a previous decision. This decision has significant implications for the case's progression. The plaintiff will now have the opportunity to present new evidence or arguments.

Advertisement
show_chart

Coverage Timeline

newspaper

Press Coverage

2 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

2 outlets · 2 articles

Timeline events

2 records on file

Last updated

21 hours, 5 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.