newspaper
civil-litigation
federal-courts
BATTS v. RUTGERS UCHC et al: Pro Bono Appointment
25-cv-14106
D.N.J.
Advertisement
description
Case Summary
The court appointed a pro bono attorney to represent plaintiff Batts in the case against Rutgers UCHC et al. This appointment ensures that Batts receives adequate legal representation. The pro bono attorney will help Batts handle the case.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
smart_toy
Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records.
How we verify our work.
fact_check
Docket Snapshot
account_balance
Court
D.N.J.
District of New Jersey · 3rd Circuit · NJ
tag
Docket
Not captured
Civil
timeline
Stage
Active litigation
Active
event
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
new_releases
Latest Filing
1:25-cv-14106 BATTS v. RUTGERS UCHC et al
Other · Apr 30, 2026
newspaper
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
groups
Participants
1 Defendant
2 linked entities
gavel
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to District of New Jersey, a federal district court in NJ.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 30, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes RUTGERS UCHC and others.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
chronic
Updated 6 hours, 54 minutes ago
The Story So Far
BATTS v. RUTGERS UCHC et al: Pro Bono Appointment is an active civil matter in District of New Jersey under docket 25-cv-14106.
The main identified defendant or respondent is RUTGERS UCHC. Juryvine classifies the matter around civil litigation, federal courts.
The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On April 30, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court appointed a pro bono attorney to represent plaintiff Batts in the case against Rutgers UCHC et al. This appointment ensures that Batts receives adequate legal representation. The pro bono attorney will help Batts handle the case.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
smart_toy
Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline.
How we verify our work.
About This Court
District of New Jersey (D.N.J.) is a federal district court in the 3rd Circuit, NJ.
Advertisement
Case Timeline
1 event
info
Other
April 30, 2026
1:25-cv-14106 BATTS v. RUTGERS UCHC et al
The court appointed a pro bono attorney to represent plaintiff Batts in the case against Rutgers UCHC et al. This appointment ensures that Batts receives adequate legal representation. The pro bono attorney will help Batts handle the case.
Advertisement
newspaper
1 article
Press Coverage
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
6 hours, 54 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.