legal-news

Banas v. SARNOVA HC, LLC et al

26-cv-04475 C.D. Cal.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Banas v. SARNOVA HC, LLC et al is a case filed in an unknown court. The case was filed with docket number 26-cv-04475. The current summary of the case is a Notice of Removal. The case involves a notice of removal, which is a document filed by a party to remove a case from state court to federal court.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • Notice of Removal
  • Federal Court
  • State Court
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

C.D. Cal.

Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

2:26-cv-04475 Banas v. SARNOVA HC, LLC et al

Other · Apr 27, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

1 article

1 source tracked

groups

Participants

1 Defendant

2 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 27, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes SARNOVA HC, LLC and others.

Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.

About This Court

Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
info
Other April 27, 2026

2:26-cv-04475 Banas v. SARNOVA HC, LLC et al

A Notice of Removal was filed.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

1 article
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 1 article

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

15 hours, 26 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.