1:24-cv-11582 Baby Jogger v. Monahan Products, LLC d/b/a UPPAbaby
Substitute Party ( 75
Baby Jogger v. Monahan Products, LLC d/b/a UPPAbaby is a case with an unknown court and docket number 24-cv-11582. The current summary is that a substitute party was added. The case is currently at a preliminary stage, with no further information available.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Court
Court not identified
Awaiting court metadata
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:24-cv-11582 Baby Jogger v. Monahan Products, LLC d/b/a UPPAbaby
Other · May 04, 2026
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
Participants
1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff
2 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 04, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Monahan Products, LLC d/b/a UPPAbaby, 1:24-cv-11582 Baby Jogger.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
Baby Jogger v. Monahan Products, LLC d/b/a UPPAbaby is an active civil matter under docket 24-cv-11582.
The dispute currently identifies 1:24-cv-11582 Baby Jogger on one side and Monahan Products, LLC d/b/a UPPAbaby on the other. The case is currently organized around unknown court, unknown docket number, substitute party.
Monahan Products, LLC d/b/a UPPAbaby is a case with an unknown court and docket number 24-cv-11582. The current summary is that a substitute party was added. The case is currently at a preliminary stage, with no further information available.
On May 4, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court allowed a substitution of parties in the Baby Jogger v. Monahan Products, LLC d/b/a UPPAbaby case, permitting a new party to take the place of an existing one. This change is likely due to a change in ownership or control of the defendant company.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
The court allowed a substitution of parties in the Baby Jogger v. Monahan Products, LLC d/b/a UPPAbaby case, permitting a new party to take the place of an existing one. This change is likely due to a change in ownership or control of the defendant company. The substitution will affect the ongoing litigation.
Substitute Party ( 75
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
2 days, 14 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.