civil-litigation federal-courts

Mail returned in Mostafazadeh v. Rubio et al civil case in Central District of California

25-cv-12448 C.D. Cal.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Mail sent in the civil case Mostafazadeh v. Rubio et al in the Central District of California was returned undelivered. This procedural issue may delay case progress or require updated service efforts.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • Returned mail
  • Service of process
  • Central District of California
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

C.D. Cal.

Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

2:25-cv-12448 Babak Mostafazadeh v. Marco Rubio et al

Other · May 11, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

0 articles

0 sources tracked

groups

Participants

1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff

2 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 11, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes Marco Rubio, 2:25-cv-12448 Babak Mostafazadeh.

No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.

About This Court

Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
info
Other May 11, 2026

2:25-cv-12448 Babak Mostafazadeh v. Marco Rubio et al

The court returned mail related to the case Babak Mostafazadeh v. Marco Rubio et al, docket number 2:25-cv-12448. This indicates that the court's attempt to send documents to a party failed, which could delay proceedings or signal issues with service. Tracking and resolving this is necessary to keep the case moving forward.

Advertisement
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

0 outlets · 0 articles

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

10 hours, 46 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.