Case Snapshot

The Wisconsin Supreme Court delivered a landmark ruling on April 15, holding Pabst Brewing Company liable for the asbestos exposure that led to the death of Gerald Lorbiecki, a steamfitter who worked at the Milwaukee brewery. This 5-2 decision marks a pivotal moment in a decade-long legal battle that began in Milwaukee County civil court nearly 10 years ago.

Key Developments

Major Updates

  • Gerald Lorbiecki, who passed away in 2018 from mesothelioma, was exposed to asbestos during his work as a steamfitter for various independent contractors from the 1970s through the 2000s.
  • The court’s ruling affirms that Pabst Brewing Co.
  • can be held accountable for the hazardous conditions at its facility, despite Lorbiecki’s employment being through contractors rather than directly with the company.
  • Lorbiecki’s family filed suit alleging that Pabst Brewing failed to provide a safe working environment, exposing him to asbestos-containing materials that ultimately caused his fatal illness.
  • The case raised complex questions about liability when workers are employed by third-party contractors but operate on a company’s premises.

Legal Context

The 5-2 split highlights the contentious nature of extending liability in such contexts. This ruling sets a significant precedent in Wisconsin law regarding employer liability for asbestos exposure and workplace safety. It signals to corporations that they cannot evade responsibility simply because workers are employed by contractors.

This could open the door for more claims against companies whose premises have hazardous conditions, particularly involving asbestos. For asbestos litigation nationwide, this decision underscores a growing judicial willingness to hold companies accountable for long-term health impacts on workers, regardless of direct employment status. It also reinforces the importance of rigorous safety protocols and transparency about workplace hazards.

What Comes Next

Pabst Brewing faces potential financial repercussions and increased scrutiny over its historical workplace safety practices. The ruling may prompt other plaintiffs with similar claims to pursue litigation against companies operating through contractors. The case will likely return to lower courts for damages determination and further proceedings. Meanwhile, companies in Wisconsin and beyond should reassess their liability exposure and compliance with occupational safety standards.