Case Snapshot

The case 'Robinson Sues Frank Bisignano in Federal Court' (docket 25-cv-11738) is pending before the Central District of California E1. Robinson filed suit against Frank Bisignano, with the case currently in early procedural stages E2.

Key Developments

Major Updates

  • A pro hac vice admission on record suggests out-of-district counsel has entered an appearance, indicating active representation E3.
  • the underlying claims remain unspecified in available filings E4.
  • This procedural posture matches with prior analyses noting the case's early stage and potential for forthcoming motion practice E5.
  • The court has processed multiple filings related to Bisignano in recent weeks.
  • On April 20, 2026, several motions and extensions were granted, including an extension of time for defendants in Kesler v.

Legal Context

Bisignano, waiving filing fees E28. Social Security-related motions dominated filings, with reply briefs submitted in George v.

A pro hac vice appearance by Judge BRASSEUR in a related case suggested potential influence on Robinson's litigation trajectory E63. The case is part of a broader pattern of litigation involving Bisignano.

On April 20, 2026, 14 separate cases with Bisignano as a defendant were active, including Rheaume v. These cases featured motions, extensions, and social security-related filings, indicating coordinated legal strategies E82.

What Comes Next

The court granted extensions of time in multiple matters, including Barnes v. Bisignano, where the Social Security Administration submitted administrative records E40.

A pro hac vice appearance on May 1, 2026, further highlighted ongoing litigation activity E11. The case's early stage and unspecified claims create uncertainty about its trajectory.

What The Record Shows

Docket Record

  • The case "Robinson Sues Frank Bisignano in Federal Court" (docket 25-cv-11738) is pending before Central District of California E1.
  • Robinson filed suit against Frank Bisignano, docket 25-cv-11738 E2.
  • The case is in early procedural stages, with a pro hac vice admission on record suggesting out-of-district counsel has entered an appearance E3.
  • The underlying claims are not specified in available filings E4.
  • The pro hac vice entry indicates active representation and likely forthcoming substantive motion practice E5.
  • "summary": "Robinson filed suit against Frank Bisignano, docket 25-cv-11738 E6.

Parties And Court

  • 0:25-cv-62193 Barksdale appears in this matter as Plaintiff E64.
  • 1:23-cv-02721 Mu Bey appears in this matter as Plaintiff E65.
  • 1:25-cv-04273 Hinrichs appears in this matter as Plaintiff E66.
  • 1:25-cv-07133 Figueroa appears in this matter as Plaintiff E67.
  • 1:25-cv-07337 Rios appears in this matter as Plaintiff E68.
  • 1:25-cv-08780 Meacham appears in this matter as Plaintiff E69.

Coverage And Related Matters

  • Memorandum in Support of Motion ( 8 E86.
  • Proceed In Forma Pauperis ( 2 E89.
  • Social Security Action - Plaintiff's Reply Brief ( 9 E90.

Additional Record Notes

  • The pro hac vice entry indicates active representation and likely forthcoming substantive motion practice.", "key_issues": "Nature of claims against Bisignano unconfirmed", "Pro hac vice admission of out-of-district counsel", "Early procedural posture" , E9.
  • The key legal issues identified for this case are: Nature of claims against Bisignano unconfirmed, Pro hac vice admission of out-of-district counsel, Early procedural posture E10.
smart_toy Juryvine article generated from court filings and verified news coverage. How we verify our work.