civil-litigation federal-courts

Aretis Limited files corporate disclosure in patent suit against Flyyes Technology in California

25-cv-07065 N.D. Cal.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Aretis Limited filed a corporate disclosure statement in a patent lawsuit against Flyyes Technology in the Northern District of California, docket 25-cv-07065. The disclosure complies with court rules requiring identification of interested entities.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • Patent litigation
  • Corporate disclosure
  • Rule 7.1 compliance
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

N.D. Cal.

Northern District of California · 9th Circuit · CA

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

3:25-cv-07065 Aretis Limited v. Flyyes Technology PTE. Ltd.

Other · May 12, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

0 articles

0 sources tracked

groups

Participants

1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff

2 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Northern District of California, a federal district court in CA.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 12, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes Flyyes Technology PTE. Ltd, Aretis Limited.

No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.

About This Court

Northern District of California (N.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
info
Other May 11, 2026

3:25-cv-07065 Aretis Limited v. Flyyes Technology PTE. Ltd.

In the case Aretis Limited v. Flyyes Technology PTE. Ltd., the plaintiff filed a Certificate of Interested Entities and Corporate Disclosure Statement under Rule 7.1. This filing identifies any entities with a financial interest in the case, ensuring transparency about potential conflicts of interest. It helps the court and parties understand who might influence the litigation.

Advertisement
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

0 outlets · 0 articles

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

1 day, 14 hours ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.