civil-litigation federal-courts court-watch

No recent activity reported in AP MA Funding LLC v. Limitless Entertainment Boise LLC

25-cv-06937 S.D.N.Y.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

AP MA Funding LLC v. Limitless Entertainment Boise LLC et al is a civil case with docket number 25-cv-06937. The current summary is blank, indicating that there is no current activity or update in the case. This indicates that the case may be dormant or inactive.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • Federal jurisdiction and procedural posture
  • Current docket activity and next procedural step
  • Pending motions, orders, and near-term docket movement
  • Claims pleaded in the complaint and early case posture
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

S.D.N.Y.

Southern District of New York · 2nd Circuit · NY

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

1:25-cv-06937 AP MA Funding LLC v. Limitless Entertainment Boise LLC et al

Other · Apr 21, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

1 article

1 source tracked

groups

Participants

1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff, 1 Related Organization

3 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Southern District of New York, a federal district court in NY.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 21, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes Limitless Entertainment Boise LLC, AP MA Funding LLC and others.

Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 5 days, 4 hours ago

AP MA Funding LLC v. Limitless Entertainment Boise LLC et al is an active civil matter in Southern District of New York under docket 25-cv-06937.

The dispute currently identifies 1:25-cv-06937 AP MA Funding LLC on one side and Limitless Entertainment Boise LLC on the other. The case is currently organized around Federal jurisdiction and procedural posture, Current docket activity and next procedural step, Pending motions, orders, and near-term docket movement, Claims pleaded in the complaint and early case posture.

Limitless Entertainment Boise LLC et al is a civil case with docket number 25-cv-06937. The current summary is blank, indicating that there is no current activity or update in the case. This indicates that the case may be dormant or inactive.

On April 21, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court granted a motion to dismiss a lawsuit filed by AP MA Funding LLC against Limitless Entertainment Boise LLC and others. The motion was granted because the court found that the plaintiff failed to state a valid claim. This decision means that the.

The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

About This Court

Southern District of New York (S.D.N.Y.) is a federal district court in the 2nd Circuit, NY.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
info
Other April 21, 2026

1:25-cv-06937 AP MA Funding LLC v. Limitless Entertainment Boise LLC et al

The court granted a motion to dismiss a lawsuit filed by AP MA Funding LLC against Limitless Entertainment Boise LLC and others. The motion was granted because the court found that the plaintiff failed to state a valid claim. This decision means that the lawsuit will be dismissed and the defendants will not have to defend against the claims.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

1 article
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 1 article

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

3 days, 2 hours ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.