Angel Garcia v. Upscale Collectables et al
Case Summary
Angel Garcia v. Upscale Collectables et al is tracked by Juryvine as a civil case. The available record places the matter in C.D. Cal.. The docket number on file is 25-cv-09611. This page is held in watch mode until richer filings, parties, rulings, or media coverage provide enough context for deeper analysis. Juryvine will update the summary as new court events, attorney appearances, and source documents are linked to the case.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Docket Snapshot
Court
C.D. Cal.
Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
2:25-cv-09611 Angel Garcia v. Upscale Collectables et al
Other · May 13, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff
2 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 13, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Upscale Collectables, Angel Garcia.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
About This Court
Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
Case Timeline
1 event2:25-cv-09611 Angel Garcia v. Upscale Collectables et al
The case Angel Garcia v. Upscale Collectables et al was filed in the Central District of California under docket number 2:25-cv-09611. Currently, there are no significant filings or rulings to report, so the case is on hold for further developments. Juryvine will monitor the case and update when more substantive information becomes available.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
1 hour, 1 minute ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.