Forfeiture of collateral noted in Anderson v. Unique Vintage, Inc. in New Jersey
Case Summary
Anderson v. Unique Vintage, Inc. is a civil case in the District of New Jersey under docket 26-cv-05049. The court record shows mail returned, which may affect service of process or communications.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Key Issues
- • service of process issues
- • mail returned
- • District of New Jersey
Docket Snapshot
Court
D.N.J.
District of New Jersey · 3rd Circuit · NJ
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
3:25-po-05643-1 USA vs Anderson
Other · May 10, 2026
Coverage
5 articles
3 sources tracked
Participants
3 Defendants, 1 Plaintiff
11 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to District of New Jersey, a federal district court in NJ.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 10, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Unique Vintage, Inc, Zillow Group Inc, RESTAURANT INVESTMENT GROUP, LLC and others.
Press monitoring has found 5 related articles from 3 distinct sources.
The Story So Far
Anderson v. Unique Vintage, Inc. is an active criminal matter in District of New Jersey under docket 26-cv-05049.
The dispute currently identifies 1:26-cv-05049 Anderson on one side and RESTAURANT INVESTMENT GROUP, LLC, Unique Vintage, Inc, and Zillow Group Inc on the other. The case is currently organized around Criminal charges and procedural posture, Charge status, plea posture, and court supervision, Current docket activity and next procedural step, Pending motions, orders, and near-term docket movement.
The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On May 5, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court has denied a motion to intervene in the case ORCEL v. RESTAURANT INVESTMENT GROUP, LLC, which is unrelated to Anderson v. This decision means that the parties in Anderson v. will not be affected by the outcome of the ORCEL case. On May 5, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court returned mail to plaintiff Anderson in the case Anderson v. This indicates that the court was unable to deliver the mail to the defendant, Unique Vintage, Inc.
The returned mail may be related to a court filing or other. On May 5, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court denied defendant Anderson's motion to dismiss the indictment in USA v. Anderson, a case related to Anderson v. This decision allows the prosecution to proceed with the case. The ruling is significant because it sets the stage. On May 5, 2026, the docket recorded a other: An Amended Complaint was filed.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
About This Court
District of New Jersey (D.N.J.) is a federal district court in the 3rd Circuit, NJ.
Case Timeline
6 events3:25-po-05643-1 USA vs Anderson
The court ordered the forfeiture of collateral in the case USA v. Anderson, docket number 3:25-po-05643-1. This means the collateral posted by Anderson was seized by the government, likely due to a violation or failure to meet conditions. This action removes Anderson's security interest and could affect his ability to contest the charges or secure release.
2:26-cv-05049 ORCEL v. RESTAURANT INVESTMENT GROUP, LLC
The court has denied a motion to intervene in the case ORCEL v. RESTAURANT INVESTMENT GROUP, LLC, which is unrelated to Anderson v. Unique Vintage, Inc. This decision means that the parties in Anderson v. will not be affected by the outcome of the ORCEL case. The motion to intervene was likely filed to impact the case's outcome.
8:23-cv-20822 v. ANDERSON
The court returned mail to plaintiff Anderson in the case Anderson v. Unique Vintage, Inc. This indicates that the court was unable to deliver the mail to the defendant, Unique Vintage, Inc. The returned mail may be related to a court filing or other communication.
2:16-cr-00094-1 USA v. ANDERSON
The court denied defendant Anderson's motion to dismiss the indictment in USA v. Anderson, a case related to Anderson v. Unique Vintage, Inc. This decision allows the prosecution to proceed with the case. The ruling is significant because it sets the stage for the trial to move forward.
3:26-cv-05049 Dupuis et al v. Zillow Group Inc et al
An Amended Complaint was filed.
1:26-cv-05049 Anderson v. Unique Vintage, Inc.
Judge denied the motion to dismiss filed by Unique Vintage, Inc. in the case Anderson v. Unique Vintage, Inc. (1:26-cv-05049). This decision allows the plaintiff's claims to proceed. The ruling is significant because it sets the stage for further litigation.
Coverage Timeline
Press Coverage
3:26-cv-05049 Dupuis et al v. Zillow Group Inc et al
Amended Complaint ( 27
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
3 outlets · 5 articles
Timeline events
6 records on file
Last updated
23 hours, 13 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.