newspaper
1:25-cv-02398 United States of America v. Tinch
Extension of Time ( 8
May 8, 2026
1 min read
civil-litigation
federal-courts
court-watch
Amy Lee sues Raytheon Technologies and others in Central District of California
25-cv-02398
C.D. Cal.
Advertisement
description
Case Summary
Amy Lee has filed a case against Raytheon Technologies, an RTX Business, and others, under docket number 25-cv-02398. The current summary for this case is a 'Generic Text Only Entry'. The court where this case is filed is not specified. The entry provides no information regarding the claims or the status of the litigation.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Key Issues
- • Employment law
- • Product liability
- • Corporate litigation
smart_toy
Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records.
How we verify our work.
fact_check
Docket Snapshot
account_balance
Court
C.D. Cal.
Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
tag
Docket
Not captured
Civil
timeline
Stage
Active litigation
Active
event
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
new_releases
Latest Filing
1:25-cv-02398 United States of America v. Tinch
Other · May 08, 2026
newspaper
Coverage
2 articles
2 sources tracked
groups
Participants
1 Defendant, 1 Related Organization
4 linked entities
gavel
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 08, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Raytheon Technologies, an RTX Business and others.
Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 2 distinct sources.
chronic
Updated 5 days, 3 hours ago
The Story So Far
Amy Lee v. Raytheon Technologies, an RTX Business et al is an active civil matter in Central District of California under docket 25-cv-02398.
The main identified defendant or respondent is Raytheon Technologies, an RTX Business. The case is currently organized around Federal jurisdiction and procedural posture, Current docket activity and next procedural step, Claims pleaded in the complaint and early case posture.
The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On April 28, 2026, the docket recorded a other: Amy Lee filed a lawsuit against Raytheon Technologies and its business, citing unspecified claims. The case is now part of the docket for the US District Court for the Northern District of California. The exact nature of the claims remains unclear.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
smart_toy
Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline.
How we verify our work.
About This Court
Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
Advertisement
Case Timeline
2 events
info
Other
May 8, 2026
1:25-cv-02398 United States of America v. Tinch
The court granted an extension of time for the United States of America v. Tinch case, allowing additional time for proceedings. This extension is relevant to the Amy Lee v. Raytheon Technologies case as it may impact the scheduling of related cases. The extension was granted on the docket number 1:25-cv-02398.
info
Other
April 28, 2026
5:25-cv-02398 Amy Lee v. Raytheon Technologies, an RTX Business et al
Amy Lee filed a lawsuit against Raytheon Technologies and its business, citing unspecified claims. The case is now part of the docket for the US District Court for the Northern District of California. The exact nature of the claims remains unclear.
Advertisement
show_chart
Coverage Timeline
newspaper
2 articles
Press Coverage
newspaper
5:25-cv-02398 Amy Lee v. Raytheon Technologies, an RTX Business et al
Generic Text Only Entry
Apr 28, 2026
1 min read
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
2 outlets · 2 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
3 days, 7 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.