civil-litigation administrative-law government-litigation federal-courts

Ameris Bank files declaration in civil suit against Triple E of Baton Rouge in Washington

26-cv-00590 W.D. Wash.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Ameris Bank has initiated legal action against Triple E of Baton Rouge Inc. and others in the Western District of Washington. A declaration has been filed in the case. The specific content of the declaration and its impact on the proceedings are not yet clear.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • Financial Dispute
  • Debt Collection
  • Commercial Law
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

W.D. Wash.

Western District of Washington · 9th Circuit · WA

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

2:26-cv-00590 Yuan v. United States Department of State et al

Other · May 01, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

3 articles

3 sources tracked

groups

Participants

3 Defendants, 2 Government Agencys, 2 Plaintiffs, +1 more

10 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Western District of Washington, a federal district court in WA.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 01, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Triple E of Baton Rouge Inc, United States Department of State and others.

Press monitoring has found 3 related articles from 3 distinct sources.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 2 days, 17 hours ago

Ameris Bank v. Triple E of Baton Rouge Inc. et al is an active civil matter in Western District of Washington under docket 26-cv-00590.

The dispute currently identifies 1:26-cv-00590 GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY & OVERSIGHT and 8:26-cv-00590 Ameris Bank on one side and Triple E of Baton Rouge Inc, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, and United States Department of State on the other.

The case is currently organized around Agency action and administrative review, Federal jurisdiction and procedural posture, Government parties, public agencies, or official-capacity claims, Claims pleaded in the complaint and early case posture.

The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.

On May 1, 2026, the docket recorded a other: An affidavit was filed. On May 1, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The parties filed a joint status report. On April 28, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court clerk has entered a default in the case of Ameris Bank v. Triple E of Baton Rouge Inc et al, indicating that the defendants have failed to respond to the lawsuit. This default will likely result in the court entering a judgment against the.

The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

About This Court

Western District of Washington (W.D. Wash.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, WA.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

3 events
info
Other May 1, 2026

2:26-cv-00590 Yuan v. United States Department of State et al

An affidavit was filed.

info
Other May 1, 2026

1:26-cv-00590 GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY & OVERSIGHT v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

The parties filed a joint status report.

info
Other April 28, 2026

8:26-cv-00590 Ameris Bank v. Triple E of Baton Rouge Inc et al

The court clerk has entered a default in the case of Ameris Bank v. Triple E of Baton Rouge Inc et al, indicating that the defendants have failed to respond to the lawsuit. This default will likely result in the court entering a judgment against the defendants. The defendants now have a limited time to respond or face a potential default judgment.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

3 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

3 outlets · 3 articles

Timeline events

3 records on file

Last updated

22 hours, 28 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.