1:25-cv-04100 Almonte Espinal et al v. Male Police Officer 1 et al
Notice of Appearance ( 28
Almonte Espinal and co-plaintiffs filed suit against a male police officer and other unnamed defendants. The filing is a notice of appearance, with no court information available.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Court
Court not identified
Awaiting court metadata
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:25-cv-04100 Almonte Espinal et al v. Male Police Officer 1 et al
Other · Apr 29, 2026
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
Participants
1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff
2 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 29, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Male Police Officer 1, 1:25-cv-04100 Almonte Espinal.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
Almonte Espinal et al v. Male Police Officer 1 et al is an active civil matter under docket 25-cv-04100.
The dispute currently identifies 1:25-cv-04100 Almonte Espinal on one side and Male Police Officer 1 on the other. The case is currently organized around Unknown court information, Notice of Appearance.
The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On April 29, 2026, the docket recorded a other: A Notice of Appearance was filed.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
A Notice of Appearance was filed.
Notice of Appearance ( 28
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
22 hours, 3 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.