civil-litigation court-opinion federal-courts court-watch

Allums v. Bay Area Rapid Transit

25-cv-08837 S.D.N.Y.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

This case involves a notice of appearance or withdrawal of counsel. The filing indicates a change in legal representation for one of the parties. The specific details of the representation change are not provided in the current summary.

Latest development

7:25-cv-08837 In re: Anderson

Opinion · May 1, 2026

The court issued a written opinion.

description View filing

Key Issues

  • • Legal representation
  • • Counsel appearance
  • • Withdrawal of counsel
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

S.D.N.Y.

Southern District of New York · 2nd Circuit · NY

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

2:25-cv-08837 Maria Monzo Castillo v. General Motors, LLC et al

Other · May 06, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

3 articles

3 sources tracked

groups

Participants

2 Defendants, 1 Plaintiff

4 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Southern District of New York, a federal district court in NY.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 06, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes Bay Area Rapid Transit, General Motors, LLC, 2:25-cv-08837 Maria Monzo Castillo and others.

Press monitoring has found 3 related articles from 3 distinct sources.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 9 hours, 27 minutes ago

Allums v. Bay Area Rapid Transit is an active civil matter in Southern District of New York under docket 25-cv-08837.

The dispute currently identifies 2:25-cv-08837 Maria Monzo Castillo on one side and Bay Area Rapid Transit and General Motors, LLC on the other. The case is currently organized around case management, case conference, Bay Area Rapid Transit.

The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.

On May 6, 2026, the docket recorded a other: A Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel was filed. On May 1, 2026, the docket recorded a opinion: The court issued a written opinion. On April 23, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court set or revised the case schedule.

The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

About This Court

Southern District of New York (S.D.N.Y.) is a federal district court in the 2nd Circuit, NY.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

3 events
info
Other May 6, 2026

2:25-cv-08837 Maria Monzo Castillo v. General Motors, LLC et al

A Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel was filed.

description View filing open_in_new
menu_book
Opinion May 1, 2026

7:25-cv-08837 In re: Anderson

The court issued a written opinion.

description View filing open_in_new
info
Other April 23, 2026

3:25-cv-08837 Allums v. Bay Area Rapid Transit

The court set or revised the case schedule.

description View filing open_in_new
Advertisement
show_chart

Coverage Timeline

newspaper

Press Coverage

3 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

3 outlets · 3 articles

Timeline events

3 records on file

Last updated

4 hours, 5 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.