civil-litigation government-litigation federal-courts

Northern District of Illinois Grants Extension of Time in Allababidi v. City of Park Ridge

25-cv-15786 N.D. Ill.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

The court granted an extension of time in Allababidi v. City of Park Ridge, Illinois, docket 25-cv-15786. This order provides the parties additional time to meet procedural deadlines, likely related to discovery or motion practice.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • Extension of time
  • Procedural deadlines
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

N.D. Ill.

Northern District of Illinois · 7th Circuit · IL

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

1:25-cv-15786 Allababidi v. City of Park Ridge, Illinois

Other · May 11, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

0 articles

0 sources tracked

groups

Participants

1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff

2 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Northern District of Illinois, a federal district court in IL.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 11, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes City of Park Ridge, Illinois, 1:25-cv-15786 Allababidi.

No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.

About This Court

Northern District of Illinois (N.D. Ill.) is a federal district court in the 7th Circuit, IL.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
info
Other May 11, 2026

1:25-cv-15786 Allababidi v. City of Park Ridge, Illinois

The court granted an extension of time in the case Allababidi v. City of Park Ridge, Illinois, docket number 1:25-cv-15786. This means one party requested and received more time to meet a deadline under Rule 28. The extension could affect the schedule for filings or other procedural steps in the case.

Advertisement
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

0 outlets · 0 articles

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

13 hours, 55 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.