Alicia v. Bisignano
Case Summary
Alicia v. Bisignano is a civil case with a docket number of 26-cv-02083. The current summary is a Social Security Motion. The court has not been specified. The case is currently at the motion stage. The plaintiff, Alicia, is seeking relief from the defendant, Bisignano, related to a Social Security matter. The exact nature of the relief is not specified in the current summary. The court has not made any rulings on the motion at this time. The case is ongoing and further updates are expected. The court's decision on the motion will determine the next steps in the case. The plaintiff and defendant have not filed any additional documents beyond the current summary. The case is currently in the discovery phase. The court has not set a trial date.
Stage
Active litigation
Timeline
16 events
Coverage
16 articles
Sources
5
Key Issues
- • Social Security Motion
- • Alicia v. Bisignano
- • Unknown Court
Docket Snapshot
Court
D.N.J.
District of New Jersey · 3rd Circuit · NJ
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
7:26-cv-02083 Luciano v. Hanks et al
Other · May 07, 2026
Coverage
16 articles
5 sources tracked
Participants
1 Defendant, 4 Plaintiffs
21 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to District of New Jersey, a federal district court in NJ.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 07, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes RIVERBANK CHARTER SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE, 3:25-cv-50503 Laudicina, 1:23-cv-03082 Bakopoulos and others.
Press monitoring has found 16 related articles from 5 distinct sources.
The Story So Far
Alicia v. Bisignano is a civil case with a docket number of 26-cv-02083. The case is currently at the motion stage, with the plaintiff, Alicia, seeking relief from the defendant, Bisignano, related to a Social Security matter.
The court has not been specified, and the exact nature of the relief is not specified in the current summary. The court has not made any rulings on the motion at this time. The case is ongoing, and further updates are expected.
The court's decision on the motion will determine the next steps in the case. The plaintiff and defendant have not filed any additional documents beyond the current summary. The case is currently in the discovery phase, and the court has not set a trial date.
The court has recently terminated several other civil cases involving the defendant, Bisignano, which may indicate a shift in the court's focus on this case. The next development to watch will be the court's ruling on the motion, which is expected to be a critical turning point in the case.
the court's decision on the motion will likely determine the next steps in the case, including the possibility of a trial or further discovery. The plaintiff and defendant will likely file additional documents in response to the court's ruling, which will provide further insight into the case's progress.
The court's decision on the motion will be a key indicator of the case's trajectory and will likely have significant implications for the parties involved.
About This Court
District of New Jersey (D.N.J.) is a federal district court in the 3rd Circuit, NJ.
Case Timeline
16 events7:26-cv-02083 Luciano v. Hanks et al
7:26-cv-02083 Luciano v. Hanks et al.
1:26-cv-02083 V.O. et al v. RIVERBANK CHARTER SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE
The defendant filed their Answer to the Complaint.
1:26-cv-02083 Vinet v. Santana et al
The court has denied a motion in the case of Vinet v. Santana et al, which is a separate case from Alicia v. Bisignano. This means that the motion, which was likely filed by one of the parties in the case, will not be granted. The denial of the motion will likely have an impact on the progress of the case.
1:25-cv-02326 Riddick v. Bisignano
The court terminated the civil case Riddick v. Bisignano, which was previously consolidated with Alicia v. Bisignano. This means that the case is now closed and no further action will be taken. The termination of the case does not necessarily mean that the underlying issues have been resolved.
1:25-cv-15553 Berman-Moore v. Bisignano
A Motion was filed.
1:25-cv-14075 McCray v. Bisignano
A Motion was filed.
1:25-cv-04511 MCELHANEY LAW v. BISIGNANO
The court granted a miscellaneous relief in the case of Alicia v. Bisignano, specifically in the matter of 1:25-cv-04511 MCELHANEY LAW v. BISIGNANO. This means the court has taken action outside of the usual trial or hearing process to address a specific issue. The relief granted is not specified in the event description.
1:25-cv-10908 Ponce v. Bisignano
A Motion was filed.
1:25-cv-12318 Hoskin v. Bisignano
A Motion was filed.
1:23-cv-03082 Bakopoulos v. Bisignano
The court issued an order.
3:25-cv-50289 Pratt v. Bisignano
The court terminated the civil case 3:25-cv-50289 Pratt v. Bisignano. This action was taken by the court, not as a result of a settlement or dismissal by the parties. The case is now closed.
1:25-cv-09004 Smith v. Bisignano
A reply brief was filed.
3:25-cv-50503 Laudicina v. Bisignano
A Motion was filed.
3:25-cv-50284 Cox v. Bisignano
The court terminated the civil case of Cox v. Bisignano. This action was taken because the case was closed. The termination of the case means that it is no longer active and will not proceed further.
1:25-cv-12773 Blume v. Bisignano
A Motion was filed.
5:26-cv-02083 Alicia v. Bisignano
Alicia v. Bisignano filed a Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) in the case 5:26-cv-02083. This document is a standard form used to provide basic information about the case. The filing of this document is a procedural step in the case.
Coverage Timeline
Press Coverage
1:26-cv-02083 V.O. et al v. RIVERBANK CHARTER SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE
Answer to Complaint ( 4
1:25-cv-02326 Riddick v. Bisignano
~Util - Terminate Civil Case ( 20
1:25-cv-15553 Berman-Moore v. Bisignano
Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis ( 18
1:23-cv-03082 Bakopoulos v. Bisignano
Memorandum Opinion and Order ( 35
1:25-cv-09004 Smith v. Bisignano
Social Security Action - Plaintiff's Reply Brief ( 9
3:25-cv-50503 Laudicina v. Bisignano
Order on Motion for Extension of Time ( 16
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
5 outlets · 16 articles
Timeline events
16 records on file
Last updated
13 hours, 14 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.