newspaper
2:25-cv-19131 BATISTA v. WELLS FARGO BANK N.A. et al
~Util - Set/Clear Flags
May 7, 2026
1 min read
legal-news
Agan v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
26-cv-05475
W.D. Wash.
Advertisement
description
Case Summary
The court denied a motion to dismiss filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and other defendants in the Agan v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al case. This decision allows the plaintiff's claims to proceed. The court's ruling is significant because it keeps the case alive and allows the plaintiff to continue pursuing their claims.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
smart_toy
Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records.
How we verify our work.
fact_check
Docket Snapshot
account_balance
Court
W.D. Wash.
Western District of Washington · 9th Circuit · WA
tag
Docket
Not captured
Civil
timeline
Stage
Active litigation
Active
event
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
new_releases
Latest Filing
2:25-cv-19131 BATISTA v. WELLS FARGO BANK N.A. et al
Other · May 07, 2026
newspaper
Coverage
2 articles
2 sources tracked
groups
Participants
2 Defendants, 1 Related Organization
5 linked entities
gavel
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Western District of Washington, a federal district court in WA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 07, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes WELLS FARGO BANK N.A, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A and others.
Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 2 distinct sources.
About This Court
Western District of Washington (W.D. Wash.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, WA.
Advertisement
Case Timeline
2 events
info
Other
May 7, 2026
2:25-cv-19131 BATISTA v. WELLS FARGO BANK N.A. et al
2:25-cv-19131 BATISTA v. WELLS FARGO BANK N.A. et al.
info
Other
May 7, 2026
3:26-cv-05475 Agan v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
The court denied a motion to dismiss filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and other defendants in the Agan v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al case. This decision allows the plaintiff's claims to proceed. The court's ruling is significant because it keeps the case alive and allows the plaintiff to continue pursuing their claims.
Advertisement
newspaper
2 articles
Press Coverage
newspaper
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
2 outlets · 2 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
1 hour, 2 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.