Adam v. Otis Bantum Correctional Facility et al

description

Case Summary

The court processed a payment from Adam, the plaintiff, to cover the filing fee for his case. This payment is a required step in proceeding with the lawsuit. The payment was made by Adam himself, as he is representing himself in the case.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.

fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

Court not identified

Awaiting court metadata

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

1:24-cv-09613 Adam v. Otis Bantum Correctional Facility et al

Other · May 05, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

1 article

1 source tracked

groups

Participants

1 Defendant

2 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 05, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes Otis Bantum Correctional Facility and others.

Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.

Case Timeline

1 event

info

Other May 5, 2026

1:24-cv-09613 Adam v. Otis Bantum Correctional Facility et al

The court processed a payment from Adam, the plaintiff, to cover the filing fee for his case. This payment is a required step in proceeding with the lawsuit. The payment was made by Adam himself, as he is representing himself in the case.

description View filing open_in_new

newspaper

Press Coverage

1 article

All No paywall (1) Original reporting (1)

newspaper

Coverage

1:24-cv-09613 Adam v. Otis Bantum Correctional Facility et al

Pro Se Payment of Fee - Processed

May 5, 2026 · 1 min read