civil-litigation federal-courts court-watch

DC Court Filings Update in Iran Lawsuit

21-cv-06247 D.D.C.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Accardi and other plaintiffs are suing the Islamic Republic of Iran in the District of Columbia. The court has filed a notice regarding an unspecified 'Other' filing. This filing is numbered 179, suggesting it is part of a larger set of documents in the case.

Stage

Active litigation

Timeline

23 events

Coverage

23 articles

Sources

2

Key Issues

  • International law
  • Sovereign immunity
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

D.D.C.

District of Columbia · D.C. Circuit · DC

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

1:17-cv-00131 STEARNS et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN

Other · Apr 30, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

23 articles

2 sources tracked

groups

Participants

3 Defendants, 5 Plaintiffs

26 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to District of Columbia, a federal district court in DC.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 30, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes Islamic Republic of Iran, Islamic Republic Of Iran, ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN and others.

Press monitoring has found 23 related articles from 2 distinct sources.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 23 hours, 5 minutes ago

Accardi et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran is an active civil matter in District of Columbia under docket 21-cv-06247.

The main identified plaintiff or petitioner is 1:18-cv-02248 ESTATE OF CHRISTOPHER BROOK FISHBECK, 1:18-cv-05306 Derubbio, and 1:20-cv-09387 Hargrave. The case is currently organized around Federal jurisdiction and procedural posture, Current docket activity and next procedural step, Pending motions, orders, and near-term docket movement.

The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.

On April 30, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court issued a notice in the case Accardi et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran, indicating that a document has been filed. This notice is a routine update to the court's records.

The notice does not indicate any significant development in the case. On April 30, 2026, the docket recorded a order: A Motion was filed. On April 30, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court entered judgment.

The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

About This Court

District of Columbia (D.D.C.) is a federal district court in the D.C. Circuit, DC.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

20 events
info
Other April 30, 2026

1:17-cv-00131 STEARNS et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN

The court issued a notice in the case Accardi et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran, indicating that a document has been filed. This notice is a routine update to the court's records. The notice does not indicate any significant development in the case.

gavel
Order April 30, 2026

1:20-cv-01557 TAITT et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al

A Motion was filed.

info
Other April 30, 2026

1:20-cv-09387 Hargrave et al v. Islamic Republic Of Iran

The court entered judgment.

info
Other April 30, 2026

1:20-cv-10460 Asaro et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran

The court entered judgment.

info
Other April 30, 2026

1:20-cv-10902 Bianco et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran

The court entered judgment.

info
Other April 30, 2026

1:21-cv-10239 Amato et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran

The court entered judgment.

info
Other April 30, 2026

1:22-cv-10823 Strauss et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran

The court entered judgment.

info
Other April 30, 2026

1:23-cv-08305 Lopez et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran

The court entered judgment.

info
Other April 30, 2026

1:23-cv-10824 Fennelly et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran

The court entered judgment.

info
Other April 30, 2026

1:19-cv-11767 Mellon et al v. Islamic Republic Of Iran

The court entered judgment.

gavel
Order April 30, 2026

1:20-cv-00850 JONES et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN

A Motion was filed.

gavel
Order April 30, 2026

1:21-cv-01187 GUNN et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN

A Motion was filed.

gavel
Order April 30, 2026

1:16-cv-01625 BARRY et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN

A Motion was filed.

info
Other April 30, 2026

1:20-cv-09376 Aron et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran

The court entered judgment.

info
Other April 30, 2026

1:16-cv-00232 KARCHER et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN

The parties filed a joint status report.

info
Other April 30, 2026

1:18-cv-05306 Derubbio et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran

The court entered judgment.

info
Other April 29, 2026

1:25-cv-03264 ESTATE OF YONA BETZALEL BRIEF et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al

A brief was filed.

gavel
Order April 29, 2026

1:11-cv-01377 ROTH et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al

A Motion was filed.

info
Other April 29, 2026

1:22-cv-01512 FLORES et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al

The court issued a notice in the case Accardi et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran, indicating that a new filing has been made. The notice is related to case 1:22-cv-01512 FLORES et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al. This filing is identified as a Notice (Other).

info
Other April 28, 2026

1:23-cv-02333 ST. JOHN et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al

An affidavit was filed.

Loading more events...
Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

23 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

2 outlets · 23 articles

Timeline events

23 records on file

Last updated

5 hours, 45 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.