civil-litigation administrative-law federal-courts

Abel Soto files appearance in civil suit against Los Angeles Sheriff's Department

24-cv-10966 C.D. Cal.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

In Abel Soto v. Los Angeles Sheriff's Department et al, filed in the Central District of California under docket 24-cv-10966, an appearance was recorded. Details on case progression remain limited.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • Attorney appearance
  • Civil rights claim
  • Law enforcement defendant
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

C.D. Cal.

Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

2:24-cv-10966 Abel Soto v. Los Angeles Sheriff's Department et al

Other · May 12, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

0 articles

0 sources tracked

groups

Participants

1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff

2 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 12, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes Los Angeles Sheriffs Department, 2:24-cv-10966 Abel Soto.

No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.

About This Court

Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
info
Other May 12, 2026

2:24-cv-10966 Abel Soto v. Los Angeles Sheriff's Department et al

Abel Soto appeared in court for his case against the Los Angeles Sheriff's Department, docket number 2:24-cv-10966. This appearance marks a procedural step in moving the case forward. It matters because it confirms the parties are actively engaging with the court process.

Advertisement
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

0 outlets · 0 articles

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

7 hours, 57 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.