civil-litigation federal-courts

Central District of California issues report and recommendation in Perez Jr. v. Robertson

18-cv-02161 C.D. Cal.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

The Central District of California issued a report and recommendation in Perez Jr. v. Robertson. The report likely addresses dispositive motions or procedural matters pending in the case. The docket number is 18-cv-02161.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • Report and recommendation
  • Procedural rulings
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

C.D. Cal.

Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

8:18-cv-02161 Abel Perez Jr. v. Jim Robertson

Other · May 11, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

0 articles

0 sources tracked

groups

Participants

1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff

2 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 11, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes Jim Robertson, Abel Perez Jr.

No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.

About This Court

Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
info
Other May 11, 2026

8:18-cv-02161 Abel Perez Jr. v. Jim Robertson

The court issued a Report and Recommendation in the case Abel Perez Jr. v. Jim Robertson, docket number 8:18-cv-02161. This document likely contains the magistrate judge's findings and suggested rulings on motions or case management issues. It matters because the district judge will review this report to decide the next steps or rulings in the case.

Advertisement
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

0 outlets · 0 articles

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

14 hours, 58 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.