9:26-cr-80056-1 USA v. Castanon-Bautista
Case Summary
This criminal case involves the United States versus Castanon-Bautista. The docket reflects a clerk's notice indicating the reassignment of a closed case, suggesting administrative updates rather than substantive litigation activity. No further details on charges or proceedings are provided.
Stage
Court order issued
Timeline
8 events
Coverage
8 articles
Sources
1
Key Issues
- • Case reassignment
- • Closed case status
- • Criminal docket management
Case Timeline
8 events9:26-cr-80056-1 USA v. Castanon-Bautista
The court issued a scheduling order in the case USA v. Castanon-Bautista, which sets the timeline for upcoming proceedings and deadlines. This helps organize the case efficiently and ensures that both parties know when to prepare and submit necessary documents.
9:26-cr-80066-1 USA v. Lopez-Mendez
In the case of USA v. Lopez-Mendez, the court issued an order regarding a request for a hearing. This means the judge has decided how to proceed with the motion, which could affect the timeline or outcome of the case. Such orders help clarify procedural steps and ensure the case moves forward properly.
9:26-cr-80012-1 USA v. Kashpur
In the case USA v. Castanon-Bautista, a verdict was reached following the disclosure of the Presentence Investigation and Plea and Sentencing Report. This report provides the court with detailed background information about the defendant to assist in determining an appropriate sentence. The event marks a key step toward finalizing the defendant's punishment.
9:21-cr-80069-1 USA v. Chatman
The court clerk issued a notice that the case USA v. Chatman, which was previously closed, has been reassigned. This means the responsibility for the case has been transferred to a different judge or court division. Such reassignments help manage court workloads and ensure cases are properly handled.
9:26-cr-80042-1 USA v. Voutsinas
The court issued an order regarding a request to delay the trial in the case USA v. Voutsinas. This means the trial date will be pushed back to allow more time for preparation or other reasons. Such decisions can affect the timeline and strategy of the legal proceedings.
9:26-cr-80047-1 USA v. Martinez-Arriaga
In the case USA v. Castanon-Bautista, the court disclosed the Presentence Investigation Report and the Plea and Sentencing Report. These documents provide detailed background information and recommendations that help the judge decide the appropriate sentence. This step is crucial as it ensures the sentencing is fair and based on a thorough understanding of the defendant's circumstances.
9:26-cr-80016-3 USA v. Fray et al
The trial for the case USA v. Fray and others, related to case number 9:26-cr-80016-3, was continued, meaning it was paused or postponed to a later date. This delay affects the court schedule and the parties involved, potentially impacting the timeline for resolution.
9:22-cr-80096-1 USA v. Falabella
In the case USA v. Castanon-Bautista, a miscellaneous relief was filed related to another case, USA v. Falabella. This indicates that the court addressed an additional request or issue that may affect the proceedings. Such filings can influence case management or legal strategy.
Press Coverage
9:26-cr-80056-1 USA v. Castanon-Bautista
Scheduling Order ( 20
9:26-cr-80066-1 USA v. Lopez-Mendez
Order on Motion for Hearing
9:26-cr-80012-1 USA v. Kashpur
Disclosure of Presentence Investigation/Plea and Sentencing Report ( 44
9:21-cr-80069-1 USA v. Chatman
Clerk's Notice of Reassignment of Closed Case
9:26-cr-80042-1 USA v. Voutsinas
Order on Motion to Continue Trial
9:26-cr-80047-1 USA v. Martinez-Arriaga
Disclosure of Presentence Investigation/Plea and Sentencing Report ( 18
9:26-cr-80016-3 USA v. Fray et al
Continue Trial ( 51
9:22-cr-80096-1 USA v. Falabella
Miscellaneous Relief ( 49