9:25-cv-00267 Tolbert v. Texas Department Of Criminal Justice
Case Summary
Tolbert filed a civil suit against the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. The docket notes a motion or order to appoint counsel, indicating that the plaintiff may be proceeding without legal representation and has requested court-appointed counsel. The nature of the claims remains unspecified.
Stage
Active litigation
Timeline
5 events
Coverage
5 articles
Sources
1
Key Issues
- • Appointment of counsel
- • Civil rights or prison-related claims
- • Representation challenges
Case Timeline
5 events9:25-cv-00267 Tolbert v. Texas Department Of Criminal Justice
The court held a scheduling and case management conference for the case Tolbert v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice. During this meeting, the judge and the parties discussed timelines and procedures to organize the case efficiently. This helps ensure the case proceeds smoothly and deadlines are set for future actions.
6:26-cv-00056 Hanson v. Texas Department Of Criminal Justice et al
In the case Tolbert v. Texas Department Of Criminal Justice, there was an acknowledgment of receipt related to another case, Hanson v. Texas Department Of Criminal Justice et al. This means the court or parties confirmed they received important documents or information connected to the Hanson case. Such acknowledgments help ensure all parties are informed and the legal process moves forward smoothly.
6:26-cv-00058 Rangel v. Texas Department Of Criminal Justice et al
In the case Tolbert v. Texas Department Of Criminal Justice, there was an acknowledgment of receipt related to another case, Rangel v. Texas Department Of Criminal Justice et al. This means the court or parties confirmed they received important documents or information. Such acknowledgments ensure that all parties are informed and procedural steps are properly followed.
6:26-cv-00052 Brock v. Texas Department Of Criminal Justice et al
In the case Tolbert v. Texas Department Of Criminal Justice, there was an acknowledgment of receipt related to another case, Brock v. Texas Department Of Criminal Justice et al. This means the court or parties confirmed they received important documents or information. Such acknowledgments ensure that all involved parties are informed and procedural steps are properly followed.
1:26-cv-00097 Matthews v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
In the case Matthews v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice, the court appointed a lawyer to represent the plaintiff. This ensures the plaintiff has legal assistance to effectively present their case. Having counsel is crucial for fair legal proceedings, especially in complex cases involving state departments.
Press Coverage
9:25-cv-00267 Tolbert v. Texas Department Of Criminal Justice
Scheduling Conference/Case Management Conference
6:26-cv-00056 Hanson v. Texas Department Of Criminal Justice et al
Acknowledgment of Receipt ( 6
6:26-cv-00058 Rangel v. Texas Department Of Criminal Justice et al
Acknowledgment of Receipt ( 6
6:26-cv-00052 Brock v. Texas Department Of Criminal Justice et al
Acknowledgment of Receipt ( 9
1:26-cv-00097 Matthews v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
Appoint Counsel ( 38