Lopez Perez v. Prince et al
Case Summary
Lopez Perez v. Prince et al is currently at the stage of an Initial Pretrial Conference. This conference is typically used to organize the case schedule, discuss discovery plans, and address preliminary matters to prepare for trial or settlement discussions.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Key Issues
- • Pretrial conference
- • Discovery planning
Case Timeline
4 events2:26-cv-01529 Marco Ruiz v. Anjani Management Inc et al
In a legal settlement, Marco Ruiz filed a lawsuit against Anjani Management Inc, seeking compensation for alleged wrongdoing. The case was later settled, resolving the dispute between the parties involved.
5:26-cv-01529 Kayvon Berry-Smith v. Lepe et al
In the case Lopez Perez v. Prince and the related case Kayvon Berry-Smith v. Lepe, a notice was filed indicating some procedural update or communication not specified in detail. Such notices often inform the court and parties about developments or administrative matters. This helps keep the case moving forward by ensuring all parties are aware of relevant information.
1:26-cv-01529 Flanagan et al v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company
In the case Lopez Perez v. Prince et al, a related case titled Flanagan et al v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company was noted. This indicates that the court is recognizing a connection or relevance between these two cases, which may impact how the current case is handled or interpreted.
7:26-cv-01529 Lopez Perez v. Prince et al
The court held the initial pretrial conference for the case Lopez Perez v. Prince et al. During this meeting, the judge and the parties discussed the upcoming steps, deadlines, and any preliminary issues to prepare the case for trial. This helps ensure the case proceeds efficiently and both sides understand the process ahead.
Press Coverage
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 4 articles
Timeline events
4 records on file
Last updated
3 days, 17 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.