6:22-cr-00128-4 USA v. Campos et al
Case Summary
USA v. Campos et al is a criminal case docketed as 22-cr-00128. The record includes a report and recommendations, which typically involve a magistrate judge's findings on pretrial matters or evidentiary issues to assist the district court in decision-making. The case likely involves multiple defendants given the 'et al' designation, and the report and recommendations may address motions, sentencing, or other procedural aspects. This step is important for advancing the criminal prosecution efficiently.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Key Issues
- • Criminal prosecution
- • Report and recommendations
- • Multiple defendants
- • Pretrial proceedings
Case Timeline
3 events4:26-cv-01638 Lopez v. Ramos et al
In the case USA v. Campos et al, a related civil case titled Lopez v. Ramos et al was referenced or noted during proceedings. This connection suggests that issues or parties in the civil case may have relevance to the criminal case, potentially impacting legal strategies or outcomes. Understanding this linkage helps clarify the broader context of the legal matters involved.
7:24-cv-09790 Carlisle v. Ramos et al
In the case of Carlisle v. Ramos et al, an affidavit of service was filed, confirming that legal documents were officially delivered to the involved parties. This step ensures that all parties are properly informed about the proceedings, which is essential for the case to move forward fairly.
6:22-cr-00128-4 USA v. Campos et al
In the case USA v. Campos et al, the court issued a Report and Recommendations document. This report provides the judge's analysis and suggested decisions on certain matters in the case, guiding the next steps in the legal process. Such reports help ensure thorough review and fair consideration before final rulings are made.
Press Coverage
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 3 articles
Timeline events
3 records on file
Last updated
3 days, 17 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.