5:26-cv-01832 Alishia Denise Ross v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., et al
Case Summary
The case titled Alishia Denise Ross v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., et al, docket number 26-cv-01832, involves a procedural matter concerning an intradistrict transfer due to a clerical error. The filing indicates that the case was subject to an administrative adjustment within the court system, likely to correct or streamline case management. Specific substantive claims or factual allegations underlying the dispute are not detailed in the available information. As such, the case appears to be in the early procedural stages rather than addressing merits of any underlying legal claims.
Stage
Motion practice
Timeline
4 events
Coverage
4 articles
Sources
1
Key Issues
- • Intradistrict transfer procedures
- • Clerical errors in case filings
- • Case management and docketing
- • Procedural compliance in federal court
Case Timeline
4 events1:26-cv-01832 Guralnick v. Too Lost LLC
In the case involving Alishia Denise Ross against Wal-Mart Associates, a notice was filed regarding a motion for a lawyer to appear pro hac vice, meaning a lawyer who is not licensed in the state is seeking permission to participate in the case. This procedural step allows the court to consider whether to grant temporary legal representation by an out-of-state attorney. It matters because it affects who can represent the parties and potentially influences the legal strategy.
5:26-cv-01832 Alishia Denise Ross v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., et al
The case of Alishia Denise Ross versus Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. was moved within the same judicial district due to a clerical error. This means the case was reassigned to a different judge or courtroom to correct an administrative mistake. Such transfers help ensure the case proceeds smoothly without procedural issues.
2:26-cv-03897 Alishia Denise Ross v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., et al
The case involving Alishia Denise Ross and Wal-Mart Associates was transferred within the same district due to a clerical error. This means the case was reassigned to the correct court division to ensure proper handling. Correcting this error helps maintain the accuracy and efficiency of the court process.
8:23-cv-00363 Tiffanie Dawn Johnson v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. et al
In the case of Tiffanie Dawn Johnson v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., the plaintiff submitted a reply related to a motion previously filed. This reply is part of the ongoing legal process where parties respond to motions to clarify their positions or provide additional arguments. Such exchanges help the court understand each side's stance before making a decision.
Press Coverage
1:26-cv-01832 Guralnick v. Too Lost LLC
Notice Regarding Pro Hac Vice Motion
5:26-cv-01832 Alishia Denise Ross v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., et al
Intradistrict Transfer - Clerical Error (G-73) - optional html form ( 5
2:26-cv-03897 Alishia Denise Ross v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., et al
Intradistrict Transfer - Clerical Error (G-73) - optional html form ( 5
8:23-cv-00363 Tiffanie Dawn Johnson v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. et al
Reply (Motion related) ( 69