5:26-cv-01393 Josue Roberto Suarez-Ruiz v. Kristi Noem et al
Case Summary
The case titled Josue Roberto Suarez-Ruiz v. Kristi Noem et al, docket number 26-cv-01393, involves a procedural filing related to counsel representation. Specifically, the document referenced is a Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel, indicating a change in legal representation for one of the parties involved. No substantive details about the underlying dispute or claims are provided in the available information.
Stage
Active litigation
Timeline
15 events
Coverage
15 articles
Sources
1
Key Issues
- • Counsel representation changes
- • Procedural compliance in litigation
- • Notice requirements for attorney appearance or withdrawal
Case Timeline
15 events5:26-cv-00737 Karamychev Andrei Vladimirovich v. Kristi Noem et al
A status report was filed in the case Karamychev Andrei Vladimirovich v. Kristi Noem et al, which is related to the case Josue Roberto Suarez-Ruiz v. Kristi Noem et al. This report provides the court with an update on the progress or developments in the case. Such updates help the court manage the case efficiently and keep all parties informed.
1:26-cv-01393 Ramales Photography LLC v. STARJEM Restaurant Corp
A status report was filed in the case Ramales Photography LLC v. STARJEM Restaurant Corp, which is related to the broader case Josue Roberto Suarez-Ruiz v. Kristi Noem et al. This report updates the court on the current progress or developments in the litigation. Such updates help the court monitor the case and manage its schedule effectively.
5:26-cv-01393 Josue Roberto Suarez-Ruiz v. Kristi Noem et al
In the case of Josue Roberto Suarez-Ruiz versus Kristi Noem and others, a formal notice was filed indicating that a lawyer has either entered or withdrawn their representation of a party. This update informs the court and all parties about who is legally representing whom moving forward.
5:26-cv-00873 Norberto Rafael Lameda Rodriguez v. Kristi Noem et al
In the case of Norberto Rafael Lameda Rodriguez versus Kristi Noem and others, a judgment was issued by the court. This means the court has made a formal decision resolving the dispute between the parties. The judgment impacts the rights and obligations of those involved in the case.
5:26-cv-01048 Cesar Enrique Jaime Hernandez v. Kristi Noem et al
A generic entry was made in the case involving Cesar Enrique Jaime Hernandez versus Kristi Noem and others, which is related to the case of Josue Roberto Suarez-Ruiz versus Kristi Noem and others. This entry does not provide specific details about any actions or decisions but serves as a placeholder or administrative note in the court record.
2:26-cv-00308 Aiying Zhao v. Kristi Noem et al
In the case of Aiying Zhao v. Kristi Noem et al, the court granted an extension allowing the defendants more than 30 days to file their answer to the complaint. This means the defendants have additional time to respond, which can affect the timeline of the case proceedings.
5:26-cv-01026 Budi T. Sihombing v. Kristi Noem et al
In the case of Budi T. Sihombing v. Kristi Noem et al, a proof of service document was filed, showing that certain legal papers were officially delivered to the involved parties. This step is crucial because it ensures that all parties are properly informed about the case proceedings.
2:26-cv-03009 Xuange Cao et al v. Kristi Noem et al
In the case Xuange Cao et al v. Kristi Noem et al, the court confirmed that the summons and complaint have been successfully served to the United States government. This means the government has been officially notified of the lawsuit and must respond accordingly.
5:26-cv-00425 Yobel Yoeber Reyes Gramajo v. Kristi Noem et al
In the case involving Josue Roberto Suarez-Ruiz against Kristi Noem and others, a scheduling notice was issued related to a separate but connected case, Yobel Yoeber Reyes Gramajo v. Kristi Noem et al. This notice outlines important dates and deadlines for court proceedings, helping both parties prepare for upcoming events. It matters because it ensures the case progresses in an organized and timely manner.
2:25-cv-02280 Vardan Mkrtchyan v. Kristi Noem et al
A notice was issued assigning a panel mediator to the case Vardan Mkrtchyan v. Kristi Noem et al. This means a neutral third party will help the parties try to resolve the dispute outside of court. Mediation can save time and resources by potentially avoiding a full trial.
5:26-cv-00508 Edmound Nasiri v. Kristi Noem et al
An appeal was filed in the case involving Josue Roberto Suarez-Ruiz against Kristi Noem and others, referencing a related case, Edmound Nasiri v. Kristi Noem et al. This appeal challenges a prior court decision and seeks a review by a higher court. It matters because it could potentially change the outcome of the case or clarify legal issues involved.
5:26-cv-00145 Ramy Eid Zaki Hakim v. Kristi Noem et al
A report and recommendation was issued in the case Ramy Eid Zaki Hakim v. Kristi Noem et al, which is related to the case Josue Roberto Suarez-Ruiz v. Kristi Noem et al. This document likely contains the court's analysis and suggested decisions for the judge to consider. It matters because it guides the judge on how to proceed with the case.
5:26-cv-01089 Jose Luis Sanchez Hernandez v. Kristi Noem et al
In the case of Jose Luis Sanchez Hernandez v. Kristi Noem and others, the defendants have formally responded to the plaintiff's complaint by filing an answer. This step is crucial as it outlines the defendants' position and defenses against the allegations, allowing the case to move forward in the legal process.
2:26-cv-01393 Jennifer Zuniga et al v. Motaur Express et al
In the case of Jennifer Zuniga and others versus Motaur Express and others, the court addressed a motion to compel arbitration. This means the court considered whether the dispute should be resolved through arbitration instead of going to trial. The decision affects how the parties will resolve their conflict, potentially speeding up the process and limiting court involvement.
2:26-cv-03319 Gean Carlos Reck v. Kristi Noem et al
In the case of Gean Carlos Reck v. Kristi Noem et al, a formal response was filed by one of the parties involved. This response is part of the ongoing legal process where each side presents their arguments or defenses. It helps the court understand each party's position before moving forward.
Press Coverage
5:26-cv-00737 Karamychev Andrei Vladimirovich v. Kristi Noem et al
Status Report ( 21
1:26-cv-01393 Ramales Photography LLC v. STARJEM Restaurant Corp
Status Report ( 11
5:26-cv-01393 Josue Roberto Suarez-Ruiz v. Kristi Noem et al
Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel (G-123) ( 9
5:26-cv-00873 Norberto Rafael Lameda Rodriguez v. Kristi Noem et al
5:26-cv-01048 Cesar Enrique Jaime Hernandez v. Kristi Noem et al
Generic Text Only Entry
2:26-cv-00308 Aiying Zhao v. Kristi Noem et al
Extending Time to Answer (More than 30 days) ( 18
5:26-cv-01026 Budi T. Sihombing v. Kristi Noem et al
Proof of Service (subsequent documents) ( 20
2:26-cv-03009 Xuange Cao et al v. Kristi Noem et al
Service of S/C Returned Executed as to USA ( 10
5:26-cv-00425 Yobel Yoeber Reyes Gramajo v. Kristi Noem et al
Text Only Scheduling Notice
2:25-cv-02280 Vardan Mkrtchyan v. Kristi Noem et al
Notice of Assignment of Panel Mediator (ADR-11) - optional html form ( 21
5:26-cv-00508 Edmound Nasiri v. Kristi Noem et al
Brief (non-motion non-appeal) ( 20
5:26-cv-00145 Ramy Eid Zaki Hakim v. Kristi Noem et al
Report and Recommendation (Issued) ( 21
5:26-cv-01089 Jose Luis Sanchez Hernandez v. Kristi Noem et al
Answer to Complaint ( 14
2:26-cv-01393 Jennifer Zuniga et al v. Motaur Express et al
Compel Arbitration ( 19