legal-news

3:25-cv-06105 Rushmore Loan Management Services LLC et al v Fogg et al

25-cv-06105 Filed
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

The case 3:25-cv-06105 Rushmore Loan Management Services LLC et al v Fogg et al involves a dispute between Rushmore Loan Management Services LLC and the defendants identified as Fogg et al. While specific details of the claims are not provided, the case appears to concern issues related to loan management or financial services, given the plaintiff's business focus. A notice of rescheduled hearing indicates ongoing procedural developments in the litigation process, suggesting active case management by the court.

Stage

Active litigation

Timeline

3 events

Coverage

3 articles

Sources

1

Key Issues

  • Loan management and servicing disputes
  • Contractual obligations and enforcement
  • Procedural scheduling and court hearings
  • Potential foreclosure or debt collection issues
  • Rights and defenses of borrowers
Advertisement

Case Timeline

3 events
info
Other April 14, 2026

2:25-cr-00148-2 USA v. Hogg et al

A judgment was entered in the criminal case USA v. Hogg et al, which is related to but separate from the civil case Rushmore Loan Management Services LLC et al v. Fogg et al. This means the court has made a final decision regarding the criminal charges against the defendants. This matters because it resolves the criminal proceedings and may impact related civil matters.

calendar_today
Hearing April 13, 2026

2:25-cr-00148-1 USA v. Hogg et al

A hearing originally scheduled in the case USA v. Hogg et al has been rescheduled. This means the court date has been changed to a new time, affecting when the parties will present their arguments. Rescheduling can impact the timeline of the case and the preparation of those involved.

info
Motion April 13, 2026

3:25-cv-06105 Rushmore Loan Management Services LLC et al v Fogg et al

In the case of Rushmore Loan Management Services LLC versus Fogg and others, a motion was scheduled to be heard as part of the court's motion calendar. This means the court is set to review and decide on specific requests or issues raised by the parties involved. Such motions can influence the direction and progress of the case.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

3 articles