3:21-cv-20029 BURGESS v. WALMART, INC. et al
Case Summary
This case involves Burgess suing Walmart, Inc. and others. The docket indicates ongoing procedural activity, including scheduling hearings. Specific claims or legal issues have not been detailed in the available information.
Stage
Active litigation
Timeline
6 events
Coverage
6 articles
Sources
1
Key Issues
- • Procedural hearings
- • Plaintiff vs. corporate defendant
- • Case management
Case Timeline
6 events3:21-cv-20029 BURGESS v. WALMART, INC. et al
In the case of Burgess versus Walmart and others, a procedural event occurred that does not fall under typical categories like motions or hearings. While the specific details are not provided, such events can include administrative actions or updates in the case docket. These updates help keep the case moving forward by ensuring all parties and the court are informed of the latest developments.
3:23-cv-21821 CAMPBELL v. WALMART, INC. et al
The court has officially closed the civil case titled CAMPBELL v. WALMART, INC. This means that all legal proceedings related to this case have concluded, and no further actions will be taken. Closing the case brings finality to the dispute between the parties involved.
1:26-cv-00351 GREEN v. WALMART, INC. et al
In the case of Green v. Walmart, the court issued an order regarding a request to submit additional documents or arguments. This decision determines whether the party is allowed to add new information to the case, which can impact the direction and outcome of the litigation.
2:25-cv-14337 BARRON v. WALMART INC et al
A hearing was scheduled in the case Barron v. Walmart Inc., which is related to the broader litigation involving Walmart. This hearing is part of the court's process to manage and organize the case proceedings. It matters because it helps set the timeline and structure for how the case will move forward.
2:25-cv-16873 GRIFFIN-GRIFFITS v. WALMART, INC. et al
A status conference was held in the case Griffin-Griffits v. Walmart, Inc., which is related to the ongoing litigation involving Walmart. This meeting allows the judge and the parties to discuss the progress of the case and plan the next steps. It helps ensure the case moves forward efficiently.
2:22-cv-02403 FINIZIO v. WAL MART INC. et al
The court issued an order dismissing the case Finizio v. Wal Mart Inc., which means the lawsuit has been officially closed without proceeding to trial. This dismissal could be due to various reasons such as settlement, lack of evidence, or procedural issues. It matters because it ends the legal dispute between the parties in this specific case.
Press Coverage
3:21-cv-20029 BURGESS v. WALMART, INC. et al
3:23-cv-21821 CAMPBELL v. WALMART, INC. et al
Terminate Civil Case
1:26-cv-00351 GREEN v. WALMART, INC. et al
Order on Motion for Leave to File
2:25-cv-14337 BARRON v. WALMART INC et al
~Util - Set Hearings ( 13
2:25-cv-16873 GRIFFIN-GRIFFITS v. WALMART, INC. et al
Status Conference
2:22-cv-02403 FINIZIO v. WAL MART INC. et al
Order of Dismissal ( 63