judicial-watch

Century Surety Company v. Borgese Construction and Development, Inc. et al

26-cv-03641
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Century Surety Company filed a civil lawsuit against Borgese Construction and Development, Inc. and others, docketed as 26-cv-03641. Recently, the case was assigned to a U.S. Magistrate Judge, and a declination of consent form was filed, indicating procedural steps related to case management and judicial assignment.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • Surety bonds
  • Construction disputes
  • Judicial assignment
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
Advertisement

Case Timeline

2 events
info
Other April 15, 2026

3:26-cv-03641 NAIDANOV v. WARDEN OF THE ELIZABETH CONTRACT DETENTION FACILITY et al

A new case titled NAIDANOV v. WARDEN OF THE ELIZABETH CONTRACT DETENTION FACILITY and others has been filed under the same docket number as Century Surety Company v. Borgese Construction and Development, Inc. This indicates a separate legal matter involving the detention facility's warden has been initiated, which may affect ongoing proceedings or involve related issues.

info
Other April 15, 2026

2:26-cv-03641 Century Surety Company v. Borgese Construction and Development, Inc. et al

The case Century Surety Company v. Borgese Construction and Development, Inc. was assigned to a U.S. Magistrate Judge, and the parties declined to consent to have the magistrate judge preside over the case. This means the case will proceed under the supervision of a district judge instead of the magistrate judge. Such assignments help manage court resources and clarify which judge will oversee the case.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

2 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 2 articles

Timeline events

2 records on file

Last updated

3 days, 17 hours ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.