legal-news

2:26-cv-03550 PEREZ RONDON v. MULLIN et al

26-cv-03550 Filed
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

The case Perez Rondon v. Mullin et al is newly filed and currently lacks substantive details beyond an initial notice of error. The docket indicates early procedural activity, but no substantive motions or pleadings have been publicly recorded to date. As such, the factual and legal issues remain undefined at this stage.

Stage

Active litigation

Timeline

4 events

Coverage

4 articles

Sources

1

Key Issues

  • Case initiation
  • Procedural status
  • Notice of error
Advertisement

Case Timeline

4 events
info
Other April 14, 2026

1:26-cv-11730 Shinwari v. Mullin et al

The court officially assigned the case Shinwari v. Mullin et al, with the case number 1:26-cv-11730, to a judge or court division. This step is an administrative action that marks the beginning of formal judicial oversight for the case. It matters because it sets the stage for all future legal proceedings and decisions in this matter.

info
Other April 14, 2026

1:26-cv-01084 COALITION FOR HUMANE IMMIGRANT RIGHTS et al v. MULLIN et al

A notice was filed indicating an error related to a new case titled Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights et al v. Mullin et al, which is connected to the ongoing matter in Perez Rondon v. Mullin et al. This notice serves to clarify or correct procedural or administrative details about the new case. It matters because accurate case records are essential for proper legal proceedings and case management.

info
Motion April 13, 2026

2:26-cv-03550 PEREZ RONDON v. MULLIN et al

In the case of Perez Rondon versus Mullin and others, the plaintiff submitted a reply to the defendant's response regarding a previous motion. This step is part of the ongoing legal process where each party presents their arguments to support their position. It matters because it helps the court understand both sides before making a decision on the motion.

info
Other April 13, 2026

2:26-cv-03797 HUERTA-MAYANCELA v. MULLIN et al

In the case Huerta-Mayancela v. Mullin, the plaintiff has voluntarily dismissed the lawsuit, meaning they have chosen to end the case without pursuing it further. This action typically indicates that the parties may have reached an agreement or the plaintiff decided not to continue with the legal claim. It matters because it stops the legal process in this particular case, potentially saving time and resources for both sides.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

4 articles