2:25-cv-17356 ROY et al v. UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES et al
Case Summary
Roy et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al concerns a civil matter involving federal immigration authorities. A recent order granted a motion for an attorney to appear pro hac vice, allowing out-of-state counsel to participate in the case.
Stage
Active litigation
Timeline
4 events
Coverage
4 articles
Sources
1
Key Issues
- • Pro hac vice admission
- • Immigration law
- • Federal agency litigation
Case Timeline
4 events3:26-cv-30060 Higgins et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
A new related case, Higgins et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, was filed and linked to the existing case Roy et al v. USCIS. This shows that multiple parties are challenging the actions of USCIS, potentially consolidating similar legal issues. Linking cases helps the court manage related disputes more efficiently.
2:25-cv-17356 ROY et al v. UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES et al
In the case of ROY et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al, there has been a formal change in legal representation, with a new attorney taking over the case. This update ensures that all future communications and filings will be handled by the newly appointed lawyer. Such changes are important to maintain proper legal procedure and clarity on who is representing the parties involved.
4:26-cv-00353 Subbaraman v. United States Citizenship & Immigration Services, (USCIS) et al
In the case Subbaraman v. United States Citizenship & Immigration Services, a summons was successfully served to the United States government. This means the government has been officially notified and must respond to the legal action. Serving the summons is a crucial step to move the case forward.
3:26-cv-01093 ZHANG et al v. UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES (USCIS) et al
The court issued an order regarding a request for an attorney to appear temporarily in the case Zhang et al v. United States Citizenship & Immigration Services without being formally admitted to the court. This allows the attorney to participate in the case despite not being licensed in that jurisdiction. It matters because it ensures that parties can have legal representation from out-of-state counsel when needed.
Press Coverage
3:26-cv-30060 Higgins et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
2:25-cv-17356 ROY et al v. UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES et al
Substitution of Attorney ( 8
4:26-cv-00353 Subbaraman v. United States Citizenship & Immigration Services, (USCIS) et al
Summons Returned Executed as to USA ( 7
3:26-cv-01093 ZHANG et al v. UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES (USCIS) et al
Order on Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( 11