2:25-cv-02884 Verlena Groomes v. City of Los Angeles et al
Case Summary
This civil case features plaintiff Verlena Groomes against the City of Los Angeles and others. The docket entry indicates scheduling activity related to setting or resetting hearings, suggesting the case is in a procedural phase involving court management of timelines. No substantive details about the claims or issues are provided, but the involvement of a municipal defendant may imply claims related to governmental actions or policies.
Stage
Active litigation
Timeline
4 events
Coverage
4 articles
Sources
1
Key Issues
- • Scheduling hearings
- • Procedural management
- • Municipal defendant involvement
Case Timeline
4 events2:20-cv-00924 Aaron Glazier v. County of Los Angeles et al
In the case of Aaron Glazier v. County of Los Angeles, a related event occurred connected to the ongoing case of Verlena Groomes v. City of Los Angeles. This indicates that there may be overlapping legal issues or parties between the two cases, which could influence how the current case proceeds.
2:25-cv-02884 Verlena Groomes v. City of Los Angeles et al
In the case of Verlena Groomes versus the City of Los Angeles and others, a reply was filed concerning a motion previously submitted. This reply is part of the ongoing legal arguments and helps clarify the party's position on the motion. It matters because it influences the court's decision on the motion, which can affect the direction of the case.
2:20-cv-02291 LA Alliance for Human Rights et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
A hearing was held in the case involving the LA Alliance for Human Rights versus the City of Los Angeles. During this hearing, the court set or reset future hearing dates to manage the progress of the case. This helps ensure the case moves forward in an organized and timely manner.
2:25-cv-05506 Umar Calderon v. County of Los Angeles et al
In the case of Umar Calderon v. County of Los Angeles, an amendment or correction was filed to update or fix previous court documents. This step ensures that the case records are accurate and reflect the current status of the litigation. Keeping court documents correct is essential for a fair legal process.
Press Coverage
2:20-cv-00924 Aaron Glazier v. County of Los Angeles et al
2:25-cv-02884 Verlena Groomes v. City of Los Angeles et al
Reply (Motion related) ( 26
2:20-cv-02291 LA Alliance for Human Rights et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
~Util - Set/Reset Hearings ( 1206
2:25-cv-05506 Umar Calderon v. County of Los Angeles et al
Amend/Correct ( 25