legal-news

2:25-cv-01435 City of Seattle v. Trump et al

25-cv-01435 Filed
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

In the case titled City of Seattle v. Trump et al, docket number 25-cv-01435, the court issued an order regarding an application for leave to appear pro hac vice. This procedural order addresses a request by an attorney who is not admitted to practice in the jurisdiction to participate in the case temporarily. The order determines whether the attorney meets the requirements to represent a party in this matter despite lacking local bar admission. No substantive rulings on the underlying claims or defenses have been indicated in this order.

Stage

Active litigation

Timeline

3 events

Coverage

3 articles

Sources

1

Key Issues

  • Pro hac vice admission
  • Attorney admission requirements
  • Procedural compliance
  • Representation in federal court
Advertisement

Case Timeline

3 events
info
Other April 14, 2026

3:26-cv-02660 MARQUEZ RONDON v. TRUMP et al

In the case Marquez Rondon v. Trump et al, a petition for a writ of habeas corpus was filed. This legal action challenges the lawfulness of someone's detention, seeking their release. It matters because it questions whether the detention complies with legal standards and protects individual rights.

description
Filing April 14, 2026

1:25-cv-01435 Chambers v. City of Wilmington et al

In the case involving the City of Seattle versus Trump and others, a related filing was made under the title Chambers v. City of Wilmington and others. The court received a partial payment of the filing fee as required by the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), indicating that the case is moving forward with some initial costs covered. This step is necessary for the court to process and consider the lawsuit.

gavel
Order April 13, 2026

2:25-cv-01435 City of Seattle v. Trump et al

The court issued an order regarding a request from an out-of-state lawyer to participate in the case City of Seattle v. Trump without being licensed in that state. This means the lawyer has been granted permission to represent a party temporarily, which can impact the legal strategies and resources available in the case.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

3 articles