2:24-cv-00634 OS-New Horizon Personal Computing Solutions Ltd. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Case Summary
In the case of New Horizon Personal Computing Solutions Ltd. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al, the court has scheduled a hearing on a pending motion. The details of the motion and the underlying dispute are not provided, but the order indicates active litigation proceedings.
Stage
Active litigation
Timeline
7 events
Coverage
7 articles
Sources
1
Key Issues
- • Motion hearing scheduled
- • Litigation between technology companies
- • Procedural posture
Case Timeline
7 events2:21-cv-00348 Power2B, Inc. v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. et al
In the case Power2B, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., an attorney officially withdrew from representing a party. This means that the lawyer is no longer involved in the case, which could impact how the case proceeds or who will represent the client going forward.
2:24-cv-00634 OS-New Horizon Personal Computing Solutions Ltd. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
In the case between New Horizon Personal Computing Solutions Ltd. and Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., a document labeled as number 225 was filed but its contents were redacted, meaning sensitive information was hidden from public view. This often happens to protect confidential business information or privacy concerns during litigation. The redaction ensures that sensitive details do not become public while the case proceeds.
4:25-cv-00200 Hannibal IP, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al
In the case of Hannibal IP, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., a formal notice was filed regarding a patent or trademark document, identified as Form AO 120. This filing is a procedural step that updates the court record with important intellectual property information relevant to the dispute. It helps ensure all parties and the court have the necessary documentation to proceed with the case.
2:24-cv-01070 OMNI MEDSCI, INC. v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS, CO. LTD. et al
In the case involving OMNI MEDSCI, INC. versus Samsung Electronics and others, a sealed response was filed in reaction to a motion. This means that one party submitted confidential information to the court to address arguments made in the motion, which is not available to the public. Such sealed filings often contain sensitive details that could impact the case's outcome.
2:25-cv-01242 Nodle Technology Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al
A new case, Nodle Technology Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., was filed alongside the existing case involving New Horizon Personal Computing Solutions Ltd. and Samsung Electronics. This indicates ongoing or related legal disputes between Samsung and different technology companies. It matters because it shows Samsung is facing multiple lawsuits that could impact its business operations and legal standing.
3:22-cv-04809 LED Wafer Solutions LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al
In the case New Horizon Personal Computing Solutions Ltd. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., an event related to another case, LED Wafer Solutions LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., was noted. This indicates a connection or relevance between the two cases, possibly involving similar parties or legal issues. Understanding this link can help clarify the broader legal context and strategy in these disputes.
2:23-cv-00587 Collision Communications, Inc. v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. et al
The court issued an order scheduling a hearing for a motion in the case involving Collision Communications, Inc. versus Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. This means the court will review arguments related to a specific request made by one of the parties. Scheduling this hearing is a key procedural step that allows the court to address important issues before moving forward.
Press Coverage
2:21-cv-00348 Power2B, Inc. v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. et al
Withdraw as Attorney ( 78
2:24-cv-00634 OS-New Horizon Personal Computing Solutions Ltd. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Redacted Document ( 225
4:25-cv-00200 Hannibal IP, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al
Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120) ( 39
2:24-cv-01070 OMNI MEDSCI, INC. v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS, CO. LTD. et al
Sealed Response to Motion ( 184
2:25-cv-01242 Nodle Technology Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al
3:22-cv-04809 LED Wafer Solutions LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al
2:23-cv-00587 Collision Communications, Inc. v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. et al
Order Setting Hearing on Motion ( 391