court-watch

USA v. Bradberry: Reentry Proceedings Active on 2010 Docket

10-mj-03096
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

USA v. Bradberry is a criminal matter filed in 2010 under docket 10-mj-03096, with reentry or drug court proceedings currently active. The age of the docket suggests this is a supervision or compliance matter rather than a new prosecution. Reentry proceedings typically involve a defendant returning from incarceration and appearing before a court for monitoring, conditions review, or drug court participation. The magistrate judge designation ('mj') confirms this originated as a lower-level federal matter. Active proceedings on a 15-year-old docket point to ongoing supervised release or a drug court program that has extended over a significant period.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • • Supervised release compliance
  • • Drug court program participation
  • • Conditions of reentry
  • • Long-term federal supervision
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
info
Other April 20, 2026

2:10-mj-03096-1 USA v. BRADBERRY

Bradberry appeared before the court for reentry or drug court proceedings in a magistrate-level criminal case in what appears to be a federal district court. These proceedings typically involve compliance reviews — the judge checks whether the defendant is meeting conditions like drug testing, treatment, or supervision requirements. A violation finding here can send a defendant back to custody; a clean report can accelerate release or discharge.

description View filing open_in_new
Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

1 article
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 1 article

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

4 hours, 16 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.