1:26-mj-01301-1 USA v. 2703d Order
Case Summary
This case involves a government request to extend the use of pen register and trap and trace devices, which capture dialing, routing, addressing, and signaling information from communications. The court granted the extension, allowing continued surveillance under these devices for investigative purposes. The order reflects ongoing law enforcement efforts to gather non-content communication data in connection with a criminal investigation.
Stage
Court order issued
Timeline
14 events
Coverage
14 articles
Sources
1
Key Issues
- • Pen register and trap and trace device use
- • Extension of surveillance order
- • Privacy and investigative authority
Case Timeline
14 events7:26-mj-01322-1 USA v. 2703d Order
The court granted an application under Section 2703(d) of the Stored Communications Act in the case USA v. 2703d. This means the government was allowed to access certain electronic communications or records relevant to the investigation. This order helps law enforcement obtain crucial digital evidence while following legal procedures.
7:26-mj-01321-1 USA v. Pen Register
In the case USA v. Pen Register, the court approved the application to use a pen register and trap and trace device. This means law enforcement is authorized to record phone numbers dialed and incoming calls, which can help gather evidence. This is important because it allows investigators to track communication patterns without accessing the content of the conversations.
7:26-mj-01312-1 USA v. Luciano
A new case titled USA v. Luciano was filed under the docket number 7:26-mj-01312-1. This event marks the official start of legal proceedings against the defendant Luciano. It matters because it initiates the judicial process and sets the stage for further legal actions in this matter.
1:26-mj-01319-1 USA v. Pen Register
The court approved an application to use a pen register and trap and trace device in the case USA v. Pen Register. This means law enforcement is authorized to record phone numbers dialed and incoming calls to gather information for their investigation. It matters because it allows authorities to collect communication data without listening to the content of the calls.
1:26-mj-01318-1 USA v. Pen Register
In the case USA v. Pen Register, the court approved an application to use a pen register and trap and trace device. This means law enforcement is authorized to collect phone number dialing and incoming call information, which can help in an investigation. Such tools provide valuable data without capturing the content of communications.
1:26-mj-00281-1 USA v. Pen Register
In the case USA v. Pen Register, the court approved an extension for the use of pen register and trap and trace devices, which capture dialing, routing, and addressing information from phone calls or electronic communications. This extension allows law enforcement to continue collecting such data beyond the original time limit. It matters because it enables ongoing surveillance in the investigation, potentially leading to more evidence.
1:26-mj-01308-1 USA v. Pen Register
In the case USA v. Pen Register, the court approved the application to use a pen register and trap and trace device. This means law enforcement is authorized to collect dialing, routing, and signaling information from a phone or electronic device. This is important because it allows investigators to track communication patterns without accessing the content of the conversations.
1:26-mj-01307-1 USA v. Pen Register
The court approved the government's request to use pen register and trap and trace devices in the case USA v. Pen Register. These devices record phone numbers dialed and incoming calls, helping investigators gather communication data. This approval allows law enforcement to collect important information to support their investigation.
1:26-mj-01306-1 USA v. Pen Register
In the case USA v. Pen Register, the court approved the application to use a pen register and trap and trace device. This means law enforcement is authorized to collect phone numbers dialed and incoming calls to a specific phone line, which helps in tracking communication patterns. This is important because it allows investigators to gather evidence without accessing the content of the calls.
1:26-mj-01305-1 USA v. Pen Register
In the case USA v. Pen Register, the court approved the application to use a pen register and trap and trace device. This means law enforcement is authorized to collect phone numbers dialed and incoming calls to a specific phone line as part of their investigation. This matters because it allows authorities to gather important communication data without accessing the content of the conversations.
1:26-mj-01304-1 USA v. Pen Register
In the case USA v. Pen Register, the court approved the government's request to use a pen register and trap and trace device. This means law enforcement is allowed to collect phone numbers dialed and received from a specific phone line, aiding their investigation. Such devices help gather important communication data without capturing the content of the conversations.
1:26-mj-01303-1 USA v. Pen Register
In the case USA v. Pen Register, the court approved the application to use a pen register and trap and trace device. This means law enforcement is authorized to collect phone number dialing and incoming call information related to the investigation. This matters because it allows authorities to gather communication data without accessing the content of the conversations.
1:26-mj-01302-1 USA v. Pen Register
In the case USA v. Pen Register, the court approved an application to use a pen register and trap and trace device, which are tools that record phone numbers dialed and incoming calls. This means law enforcement can legally collect this communication data to aid their investigation. It matters because it allows authorities to gather important information without accessing the content of the calls.
1:26-mj-01301-1 USA v. 2703d Order
The court reviewed an application related to a 2703(d) order under the Stored Communications Act (SCA) in the case USA v. 2703d. The judge decided to deny the application, meaning the requested access to certain electronic communications was not granted. This decision affects the government's ability to obtain private electronic data in this case.
Press Coverage
7:26-mj-01322-1 USA v. 2703d Order
SCA Order 18:2703(d) - Application Granted
7:26-mj-01321-1 USA v. Pen Register
Pen Register, Trap and Trace - Application Granted
7:26-mj-01312-1 USA v. Luciano
1:26-mj-01319-1 USA v. Pen Register
Pen Register, Trap and Trace - Application Granted
1:26-mj-01318-1 USA v. Pen Register
Pen Register, Trap and Trace - Application Granted
1:26-mj-00281-1 USA v. Pen Register
Pen Register, Trap and Trace - Extension Granted
1:26-mj-01308-1 USA v. Pen Register
Pen Register, Trap and Trace - Application Granted
1:26-mj-01307-1 USA v. Pen Register
Pen Register, Trap and Trace - Application Granted
1:26-mj-01306-1 USA v. Pen Register
Pen Register, Trap and Trace - Application Granted
1:26-mj-01305-1 USA v. Pen Register
Pen Register, Trap and Trace - Application Granted
1:26-mj-01304-1 USA v. Pen Register
Pen Register, Trap and Trace - Application Granted
1:26-mj-01303-1 USA v. Pen Register
Pen Register, Trap and Trace - Application Granted
1:26-mj-01302-1 USA v. Pen Register
Pen Register, Trap and Trace - Application Granted
1:26-mj-01301-1 USA v. 2703d Order
SCA Order 18:2703(d) - Application Denied