1:26-cv-04108 McKeown v. Bisignano
Case Summary
In McKeown v. Bisignano, the court issued an order granting a motion for an extension of time. This procedural ruling allows the parties additional time to meet a specific deadline, facilitating further preparation or filing of necessary documents. The extension aims to ensure fairness and adequate opportunity for both parties to present their case.
Stage
Active litigation
Timeline
14 events
Coverage
14 articles
Sources
1
Key Issues
- • Motion for extension of time
- • Procedural deadlines
- • Case management
Case Timeline
14 events1:25-cv-03705 Talia v. Bisignano
In the case McKeown v. Bisignano, another related case titled Talia v. Bisignano was noted or referenced. This indicates that there may be overlapping legal issues or parties involved between the two cases. Recognizing related cases helps the court manage and understand the broader context of the disputes.
1:26-cv-00390 Zdrojewski v. Bisignano
The case McKeown v. Bisignano was either assigned to a judge or reassigned from one judge to another. This procedural step ensures that the case has a designated judge to oversee its progress. It matters because having an assigned judge is essential for the case to move forward in the court system.
1:26-cv-02687 Rodriguez v. Bisignano
Consent to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge ( 7
7:25-cv-08942 Johnson v. Bisignano
In the case of Johnson v. Bisignano, the plaintiff submitted a brief related to a Social Security matter. This document outlines the plaintiff's arguments and evidence supporting their claim. It is a key step in the legal process as it helps the court understand the plaintiff's position.
7:25-cv-08844 Harden v. Bisignano
In the case Harden v. Bisignano, the plaintiff submitted a brief related to a Social Security matter. This document outlines the plaintiff's arguments and evidence supporting their claim. It is a key step in the legal process as it helps the court understand the plaintiff's position.
1:26-cv-04108 McKeown v. Bisignano
In the case McKeown v. Bisignano, the court granted permission for the plaintiff to proceed 'in forma pauperis,' meaning they can continue the lawsuit without paying court fees due to financial hardship. This allows individuals who cannot afford legal costs to have their cases heard. It ensures access to justice regardless of a person's economic status.
1:26-cv-04106 O'Donnell v. Bisignano
In the case McKeown v. Bisignano, the court allowed the plaintiff to proceed without paying court fees due to their inability to afford them, a status known as 'in forma pauperis.' This means the case can move forward despite the plaintiff's financial situation. The event also references a related case, O'Donnell v. Bisignano, indicating similar proceedings may be occurring.
1:25-cv-15227 Guzman v. Bisignano
In the case Guzman v. Bisignano, the court issued an order regarding a request to extend the deadline for filing certain documents. This means the party asked for more time to submit required paperwork, and the court responded by either granting or denying that request. Such decisions affect how the case proceeds and ensure deadlines are managed fairly.
1:25-cv-13225 Avelar v. Bisignano
In the case Avelar v. Bisignano, the court issued an order regarding a request to extend the deadline for a certain action. This means the court has either granted or denied more time for one party to complete a required task. Such decisions affect the pace and management of the legal proceedings.
7:25-cv-09179 McConnell v. Bisignano
In the case McKeown v. Bisignano, the court granted an extension of time related to the separate but connected case McConnell v. Bisignano. This means one party was given more time to meet a deadline, which can affect the pace and preparation of the legal proceedings.
1:26-cv-04101 Loftin v. Bisignano
In the case McKeown v. Bisignano, a related event titled Loftin v. Bisignano was noted, indicating a connection or similarity between the two cases. This suggests that the court is tracking multiple cases involving Bisignano, which may share legal issues or parties. Understanding these linked cases can provide insight into broader legal challenges or patterns involving Bisignano.
1:26-cv-02969 Moore v. Bisignano
A new case titled Moore v. Bisignano has been officially opened and assigned a case number 1:26-cv-02969. This notice informs the parties involved about the initial assignment of the case to a judge or court division. It matters because it marks the formal start of legal proceedings and sets the stage for how the case will be managed.
1:25-cv-08664 Wimberley v. Bisignano
In the case McKeown v. Bisignano, the court issued an order regarding a request for more time to submit a response or reply in the related case Wimberley v. Bisignano. This means the court is allowing additional time for the parties to prepare their arguments, which can affect the pace of the legal proceedings. Granting extensions helps ensure that all parties have a fair opportunity to present their case thoroughly.
3:25-cv-50519 Chavez v. Bisignano
The court issued an order regarding a request to extend the deadline in the case Chavez v. Bisignano. This means the court has decided whether to allow more time for one party to complete a required action. Such decisions help manage the pace of the case and ensure fairness.
Press Coverage
1:25-cv-03705 Talia v. Bisignano
1:26-cv-00390 Zdrojewski v. Bisignano
Case Assigned/Reassigned
1:26-cv-02687 Rodriguez v. Bisignano
Consent to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge ( 7
7:25-cv-08942 Johnson v. Bisignano
Social Security Action - Plaintiff's Brief ( 12
7:25-cv-08844 Harden v. Bisignano
Social Security Action - Plaintiff's Brief ( 12
1:26-cv-04108 McKeown v. Bisignano
Proceed In Forma Pauperis ( 4
1:26-cv-04106 O'Donnell v. Bisignano
Proceed In Forma Pauperis ( 4
1:25-cv-15227 Guzman v. Bisignano
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File ( 17
1:25-cv-13225 Avelar v. Bisignano
Order on Motion for Extension of Time ( 17
7:25-cv-09179 McConnell v. Bisignano
Extension of Time ( 9
1:26-cv-04101 Loftin v. Bisignano
1:26-cv-02969 Moore v. Bisignano
Case Opening Initial Assignment Notice
1:25-cv-08664 Wimberley v. Bisignano
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply ( 19
3:25-cv-50519 Chavez v. Bisignano
Order on Motion for Extension of Time ( 16